From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/reiserfs/inode: remove dead code in _get_block_create_0() Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 07:57:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20220720063310.992149-1-zengjx95@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ezIIZCU4EFhKuDAwp8CxrD6gg3vQSd6pReh1trZRbPE=; b=TX7uWhY7SglTlzuqrHNvq/dWkt JKDrshvsS3Q/z8E1BQdM2SVJKalWOWtNHp/PLQb8+uya3kd4r4wyzNpeJKIHHYz1iV5g8RIXMu+ik l3Vdw69yGW0yCcv0Q8LSQCEmV3SS9VB0QHgs/6kZvj2VTXTb6Dchn/af3J8MsITG71gWz6QHuhEE1 UJ5Obha3EVORASfMcghE4ABfuCdRDPwAEBiFCW3+d2ZfaUzHTgWyeX4TTQQRVwqtF2Ip6UkhgSuUP qkEFhI/dyKELtTnx0Im0HgHP6+osLqtxisU5Pf8otKHYK13zsl4ksxhpn2Lp9CpE68lnu2lIZFa5Q JWTmfIIA==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220720063310.992149-1-zengjx95@gmail.com> Sender: Al Viro List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: zengjx95@gmail.com Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, jlayton@kernel.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, jack@suse.cz, edward.shishkin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zeng Jingxiang On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 02:33:10PM +0800, zengjx95@gmail.com wrote: > From: Zeng Jingxiang > > Fix "control flow" issues found by Coverity > Logically dead code (DEADCODE) > Execution cannot reach this statement. > > Assigned_value: Assigning value NULL to p here > 293 char *p = NULL; > In the following conditional expression, the value of p is always NULL, > as a result, the kunmap() cannot be executed. > 308 if (p) > 309 kunmap(bh_result->b_page); > > 355 if (p) > 356 kunmap(bh_result->b_page); > > 366 if (p) > 367 kunmap(bh_result->b_page); > > Signed-off-by: Zeng Jingxiang First of all, if you find something like that, it might be a good idea to find _when_ had that appeared. If nothing else, transformation might very well turn out to be obfuscating a preexisting bug. In this case, it's not hard to find: 27b3a5c51b50 "kill-the-bkl/reiserfs: drop the fs race watchdog from _get_block_create_0()", which had removed a label upstream of these tests and a branch to it from downstream of assignment to p. Assignment survives, BTW, in the following form: if (!p) p = (char *)kmap(bh_result->b_page); and this test is just as constant as the ones you'd removed. Unlike them it's constantly true, of course, but just as inexplicable by the current form of function. If anything, I would suggest losing initialization of p to NULL and making the assignment quoted above unconditional. > --- > fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c > index 0cffe054b78e..d1b0c7645fcb 100644 > --- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c > @@ -305,8 +305,6 @@ static int _get_block_create_0(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, > result = search_for_position_by_key(inode->i_sb, &key, &path); > if (result != POSITION_FOUND) { > pathrelse(&path); > - if (p) > - kunmap(bh_result->b_page); > if (result == IO_ERROR) > return -EIO; > /* > @@ -352,8 +350,6 @@ static int _get_block_create_0(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, > } > > pathrelse(&path); > - if (p) > - kunmap(bh_result->b_page); > return ret; > } > /* requested data are in direct item(s) */ > @@ -363,8 +359,6 @@ static int _get_block_create_0(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, > * when it is stored in direct item(s) > */ > pathrelse(&path); > - if (p) > - kunmap(bh_result->b_page); > return -ENOENT; > } > > -- > 2.27.0 >