From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/debug: avoid executing show_state and causing rcu stall warning
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:10:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yuo7eYzQnzqx4u7F@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4058896-947d-c802-ac57-bf03eb986378@linux.alibaba.com>
* Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> > * Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
> > >
> > > If the number of CPUs is large, "sysrq_sched_debug_show" will execute for
> > > a long time. Every time I execute "echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger" on my
> > > 128-core machine, the rcu stall warning will be triggered. Moreover,
> > > sysrq_sched_debug_show does not need to be protected by rcu_read_lock,
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > and no rcu stall warning will appear after adjustment.
> > >
> > That doesn't mean it doesn't have to be protected by *any* lock - which
> > your patch implements AFAICS.
> >
> > There's a couple of lines such as:
> >
> > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>
> Hi,
>
> Here I refer to the implementation of "sysrq_timer_list_show", and I don't
> see any lock.
>
> Maybe there is a problem with the implementation of "sysrq_timer_list_show".
But we are talking about sysrq_sched_debug_show(), which your patch tries
to relax the RCU locking of.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 1:18 [PATCH] sched/debug: avoid executing show_state and causing rcu stall warning Liu Song
2022-08-03 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 8:58 ` Liu Song
2022-08-03 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2022-08-03 9:25 ` Liu Song
2022-08-03 12:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-08-03 14:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-03 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-03 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-03 17:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yuo7eYzQnzqx4u7F@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.