From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] bpf_prog0[5-7]: Run with kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:00:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv9tWKCKQUcct66H@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yv9lxML3bw61wI1o@pevik>
Hi!
> I.e. 1 or 2 kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled results bpf() returning EPERM for
> *all* users including root. 0 allows running again for all users, but we need
> root to set it 0 via .save_restore:
>
> tst_sys_conf.c:106: TBROK: Failed to open FILE '/proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled' for writing: EACCES (13)
>
> Maybe we could change tst_sys_conf_save() not to write the value if value can be
> read and is the same (and not run tst_sys_conf_restore() if value was the same).
That would be a good idea either way.
The unprivileged_bpf_disabled is more complicated that this though. It's
a three state as:
0 - enabled
1 - disabled and can't be enabled
2 - disabled and can be enabled
So either we add special handling for 'cannot be changed' value to
save_restore or we have to move that code to the test setup and check
it manually.
> That way we would not need to require root if value is the same.
>
> But it'd be nice to have some tag saying: maybe root is needed, depend on sysfs
> value...
I wouldn't overly complicate the situation and just require root here.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 17:17 [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] bpf_prog0[5-7]: Run with kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0 Petr Vorel
2022-08-18 17:50 ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-19 8:27 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-08-19 10:28 ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-19 10:31 ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-19 10:43 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-08-19 11:00 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2022-08-19 12:08 ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-25 14:22 ` Richard Palethorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yv9tWKCKQUcct66H@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.