From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Alexey Romanov <avromanov@sberdevices.ru>,
Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "zram: remove double compression logic"
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 16:14:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvNa6J/neNxXNSTV@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810070609.14402-1-jslaby@suse.cz>
On (22/08/10 09:06), Jiri Slaby wrote:
> This reverts commit e7be8d1dd983156bbdd22c0319b71119a8fbb697 as it
> causes zram failures. It does not revert cleanly, PTR_ERR handling was
> introduced in the meantime. This is handled by appropriate IS_ERR.
>
> When under memory pressure, zs_malloc() can fail. Before the above
> commit, the allocation was retried with direct reclaim enabled
> (GFP_NOIO). After the commit, it is not -- only __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM is
> tried.
>
> So when the failure occurs under memory pressure, the overlaying
> filesystem such as ext2 (mounted by ext4 module in this case) can emit
> failures, making the (file)system unusable:
> EXT4-fs warning (device zram0): ext4_end_bio:343: I/O error 10 writing to inode 16386 starting block 159744)
> Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 159744
>
> With direct reclaim, memory is really reclaimed and allocation succeeds,
> eventually. In the worst case, the oom killer is invoked, which is
> proper outcome if user sets up zram too large (in comparison to
> available RAM).
>
> This very diff doesn't apply to 5.19 (stable) cleanly (see PTR_ERR note
> above). Use revert of e7be8d1dd983 directly.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202203
> Fixes: e7be8d1dd983 ("zram: remove double compression logic")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.19
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> Cc: Alexey Romanov <avromanov@sberdevices.ru>
> Cc: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>
> Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-10 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-31 21:43 Linux 5.19 Linus Torvalds
2022-08-01 12:47 ` Build regressions/improvements in v5.19 Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-02 9:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-01 16:52 ` Linux 5.19 Tony Luck
2022-08-01 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-05 17:00 ` Please consider Linux 5.20 because it means "I love Linux" in Chinese (Re: Linux 5.19) Zhang Boyang
2022-08-07 17:21 ` David Laight
2022-08-09 6:03 ` ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19] Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09 7:59 ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09 8:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09 8:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 9:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 9:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 10:20 ` Dmitry Rokosov
2022-08-09 11:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 13:15 ` Aleksey Romanov
2022-08-09 13:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-10 7:06 ` [PATCH] Revert "zram: remove double compression logic" Jiri Slaby
2022-08-10 7:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2022-08-09 12:35 ` ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19] Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09 12:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-09 12:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 13:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 9:12 ` Lukas Czerner
2022-08-09 9:15 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-08-09 9:53 ` Lukas Czerner
[not found] ` <20220830214626.26544-1-charlie39@cock.li>
2022-08-31 7:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2022-08-11 14:02 ` [RESEND] Please consider name next Linux release "I love Linux" (Re: Linux 5.19) Zhang Boyang
2022-08-12 2:39 ` Baoquan He
2022-08-12 3:28 ` Huacai Chen
2022-08-12 6:31 ` Gao Xiang
2022-08-12 8:22 ` YanTeng Si
2022-08-13 17:17 ` Zhang Boyang
2022-08-14 15:22 ` WANG Xuerui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvNa6J/neNxXNSTV@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avromanov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.