From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, vadimp@mellanox.com, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend() callbacks for different thermal zones"
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:47:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvoybKfgNnHi36dN@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815091032.1731268-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:10:31AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c.
>
> As discussed in the thread:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-bff366c8aeba@linaro.org/
>
> the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is
> actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling
> device state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless.
>
> No conflict happened when reverting the patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
Daniel, the intention is to send these patches to mainline as part of
your 6.1 pull request?
I discussed it with Vadim yesterday and we do not expect changes in the
file during the current cycle so this is OK as far as we are concerned,
but I believe this will also need an ack from one of the netdev
maintainers.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 9:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend() callbacks for different thermal zones" Daniel Lezcano
2022-08-15 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone detection" Daniel Lezcano
2022-08-15 11:55 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-15 12:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-08-15 11:47 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-08-15 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend() callbacks for different thermal zones" Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvoybKfgNnHi36dN@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=vadimp@mellanox.com \
--cc=vadimp@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.