From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: Initialize getbmap structure in quantity2offset
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:19:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yvu1h/dQi9CSft0X@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166063952935.40771.5357077583333371260.stgit@orion>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Prevent uninitialized data in the stack by initializing getbmap structure
> to zero.
The kernel should fill out all the bmap[1..BMAP_LEN-1] entries, right?
The only part of the array that's critical to initialize to a known
value is bmap[0], since that's what the kernel will read to decide what
to do, right?
Or, zooming out a bit, why did you decide to initialize the struct? Was
it valgrind complaining about uninitialized ioctl memory, or did someone
report a bug?
(I'm actually fine with this change, I just want to know how you got
here. ;))
--D
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> There is already a patch on the list to remove remaining DMAPI stuff from
> xfsdump:
> xfsdump: remove BMV_IF_NO_DMAPI_READ flag
>
> This patch though, does not initialize the getbmap structure, and although
> the
> first struct in the array is initialized, the remaining structures in the
> array are not, leaving garbage in the stack.
>
>
> dump/inomap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/dump/inomap.c b/dump/inomap.c
> index f3200be..c4ea21d 100644
> --- a/dump/inomap.c
> +++ b/dump/inomap.c
> @@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static off64_t
> quantity2offset(jdm_fshandle_t *fshandlep, struct xfs_bstat *statp, off64_t qty)
> {
> int fd;
> - struct getbmap bmap[BMAP_LEN];
> + struct getbmap bmap[BMAP_LEN] = {0};
> off64_t offset;
> off64_t offset_next;
> off64_t qty_accum;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-16 8:45 [PATCH] xfsdump: Initialize getbmap structure in quantity2offset Carlos Maiolino
2022-08-16 15:19 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-08-17 8:42 ` Carlos Maiolino
2022-08-17 15:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yvu1h/dQi9CSft0X@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.