From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FED6C25B0E for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29CEE84D; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:22:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 29CEE84D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1660663420; bh=xrDCB4OmeL6+7fKYPfxbbZn7I+eTh2nJlmb4GRfx3H8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=SAQInmQ5Ioxe9vE2lj9rTV0IBAgyXbaX6uGmuQpJrxN48I+XMgnggSrqyGVrxISSv gE/WpEOcTnXdxMWynrKuTVerAoQN/Dp/KUeiJ2gpLY/PNUSF9w/WiHd2puxxXB13Lr d2WNaiPkzNSOiAeuTZoRrj7JN1qSHaJ6E4rktnxQ= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7B4F80238; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:22:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 3347BF8032D; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:22:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE938F80118 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:22:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz DE938F80118 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="a7+mnnRF" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD755B81A56; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79BD5C433D6; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:22:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1660663361; bh=xrDCB4OmeL6+7fKYPfxbbZn7I+eTh2nJlmb4GRfx3H8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a7+mnnRFvr2drlaxLAzWPMn5cEOaNq9deIPJOIJPTOe6zobX4/lu6dzJDpW4rTICC K8e5P3W898ky0jrDbYivGDT0fe5jevay2pL6ljFG/vNHBpdR7S9OBrZ9aopda8Uts5 bMyXeVYqp/OnZPUvGkkxBG++wOnPKJRqN6lL/hSQDAXFxcLZ866/49hX4crsCvs9++ SPqfnLuqRob/oXTM7dDpzLSY35zpWnfRu7Mf1eEhylAGPvgrrN9TPfrN206s9UtXD8 j8ujT+OTJZsA3c3aLlDT4eCjW7JcZ91FVnIXvvNk1kGno7mCi+hZ+xNbkeD9myziXR NaniY1k129n7A== Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:22:37 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Geraldo Nascimento Subject: Re: Rockchip I2S commit possibly ignored Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKqC/VCI0nI7SNtM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: A bachelor is an unaltared male. Cc: Sugar Zhang , ALSA-devel X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --gKqC/VCI0nI7SNtM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:37:18AM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote: > This isn't my patch, it's a patch by Sugar Zhang from Rockchip that was > supposed to have been applied one year ago, give or take 10 days. I > can't resend a patch that wasn't authored by me. There's absolutely no problem with reposting someone else's patch - just add your Signed-off-by at the end of the signoff chain. > Therefore I don't see the point of your complaint about "content free pings". In general the answer to "what's the status of this old patch?" is almost always going to be the same so there's a form letter for it, especially with such an old patch the chances of me having any recollection of what's going on are minimal. --gKqC/VCI0nI7SNtM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmL7tjwACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CmKgf9FMOrsPsMboDZFXc2fPP6G69dLWyBwfG0XbBPv16B648giO1jGD7Kf6iD QLTxK7XZyRLwtue4NoJ3qqrAaE3sQeWLd1VUyjj81dYszg6W1zwbnk+JBrCkr3Jq 09I2Hxe+leu/NYWOENNk/GvujpmD+X2zsQq97H79auabE2cxnLy9nm4Uy93MbsDB 5rW06LWjwr0gdL0mmG2ZwkE+VY86wsqTODeSdGbPP5Gfp71TrpXm8hmrNYi76ax1 GJEpEWh6C5czCzdEt00sq5yqlduQffIZ8eUDXJPe6Uzfi6gZRQHeL8pAlXFKN/Xo +064BIft0Y89eOGKajp3Soqken6oFg== =djLd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKqC/VCI0nI7SNtM--