From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A4CC25B0E for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30B9F164F; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:54:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 30B9F164F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1660668918; bh=g3VBk915lJLxJZ35VMsXzfqciAe4qfC3c6nm834wyg8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=WO7DnG57XKcr/aVZGW0qO0+8dE2mLXBavcvmPvdumn2Iy7Qs8kIyNo555uHZvJxv+ H6pJYsP0L1vROWHUvP4EtqknAu5Jdm2UhGNaUDfUSthWprVPJqE8X17HZwm3j+m6pb NtnIKKDYqs7TXRzoLzL5D7iUrhI/K/jrx77hvVNY= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E7AF80238; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:54:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 51C89F8032D; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:54:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA460F80095 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:54:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz EA460F80095 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qXCLytLM" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB65612E3; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84FC5C433D6; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:54:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1660668858; bh=g3VBk915lJLxJZ35VMsXzfqciAe4qfC3c6nm834wyg8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qXCLytLMI283wyCeqkigwRzEa4lo1AhH9bUi3s7sgv1jUMYy7UVlFzwYrIJ01rh5F H9iWePyOfSfw7T5u/qEF4MvoJZvsqDqIfaGqCCai4tsrUsMixMmHjKVdpx4f/KkQTW Dc1we6KuSu2ucpGXU5iHDtKyxeKPdAuWH1xXJ3jjeLM/AhiF3ZffUQOk2qf/b13iur rA8aNfF1PF+c3WPEufWsZ6iRpvtMH2Vq1yB4dj6MPh/yQ7Y5/GpLUBcnl9MtscJL+K DBd2uKNE+T6NOR9gbZkCME/CWa84uDIvmb1zOr53ElyMiWKknY6yWgDaecu98siO0w 5NeogqPxzQKxw== Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:54:14 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Srinivas Kandagatla Subject: Re: ASoC: snd_soc_info_volsw and platfrom_max Message-ID: References: <14f04003-7300-7d49-be51-e8341f699cda@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uadDY6vG9qOERt2J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <14f04003-7300-7d49-be51-e8341f699cda@linaro.org> X-Cookie: A bachelor is an unaltared male. Cc: alsa-devel X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --uadDY6vG9qOERt2J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:20:12PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > On 16/08/2022 16:56, Mark Brown wrote: > > Those macros just shouldn't be setting platform_max at all, the whole > goal with platform_max is that it overrides what the driver is doing for > > platform specific reasons. This is supposed to be overridable by the > Do you think we should remove setting platform_max from these macros. > Am hoping that this should also fix the issues that am seeing. Yes, we should do that regardless of what's going on with your issues. --uadDY6vG9qOERt2J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmL7y7UACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Docwf/aeluzb0O8p0NdpS70KeUO84ljRdZSf9vsAv+6DpKXm2QSUsSZAXcfsmm rUhdW/274n6xglXTw8eb/awCzbnD0Bkl/4oB6F3gYc2OD5ncIllcUDKwwgbaqVb6 AHwxAVEuclaWudz/rJBJ2luYMc2boxO2Dxc0sW8lkbGzUereGRaW8RhskJXkfeF5 Sq6Wr6v/QMEZH7g2i0GuF91myNmPeNaEiCPtMH7Cx1YVgfNo830DEtO4kQa7zaVw +d9AXwuy7CSTRf4nVnZAFHgjjuxrhXJlPN5DqYjzHgnsoX1hoenumjs3wBIiwJDX kwpemgrDBEi9mDyUNsJ48ccyyQhEJQ== =AoMq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uadDY6vG9qOERt2J--