From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Remove internal accessor helpers for id regs
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:45:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yw5MqMvqwPXBPE0a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeT=FwxN=UtVGO+85iZNRkGEoZ7GQ_WB4FAhHBRnCKoPNXHVg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Reiji,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:45:09PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:48 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > The internal accessors are only ever called once. Dump out their
> > contents in the caller.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 46 ++++++++++-----------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index e18efb9211f0..26210f3a0b27 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -1153,25 +1153,17 @@ static unsigned int raz_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >
> > /* cpufeature ID register access trap handlers */
> >
> > -static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *r,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - if (p->is_write)
> > - return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > -
> > - p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > static bool access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, r);
> >
> > - return __access_id_reg(vcpu, p, r, raz);
> > + if (p->is_write)
> > + return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > +
> > + p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> > + return true;
> > }
> >
> > /* Visibility overrides for SVE-specific control registers */
> > @@ -1226,31 +1218,13 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
> > * to be changed.
> > */
> > -static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 *val,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 val,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> > - if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > u64 *val)
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
> >
> > - return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> > + *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > @@ -1258,7 +1232,11 @@ static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
> >
> > - return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> > + /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> > + if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
>
> I see no reason for read_id_reg() to take raz as an argument.
> Perhaps having read_id_reg() call sysreg_visible_as_raz() instead
> might make those functions even simpler?
Good point, as this patch has done away with caller-specified RAZ. I'll
incorporate that into v2.
--
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Remove internal accessor helpers for id regs
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:45:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yw5MqMvqwPXBPE0a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeT=FwxN=UtVGO+85iZNRkGEoZ7GQ_WB4FAhHBRnCKoPNXHVg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Reiji,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:45:09PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:48 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > The internal accessors are only ever called once. Dump out their
> > contents in the caller.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 46 ++++++++++-----------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index e18efb9211f0..26210f3a0b27 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -1153,25 +1153,17 @@ static unsigned int raz_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >
> > /* cpufeature ID register access trap handlers */
> >
> > -static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *r,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - if (p->is_write)
> > - return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > -
> > - p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > static bool access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, r);
> >
> > - return __access_id_reg(vcpu, p, r, raz);
> > + if (p->is_write)
> > + return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > +
> > + p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> > + return true;
> > }
> >
> > /* Visibility overrides for SVE-specific control registers */
> > @@ -1226,31 +1218,13 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
> > * to be changed.
> > */
> > -static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 *val,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 val,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> > - if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > u64 *val)
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
> >
> > - return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> > + *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > @@ -1258,7 +1232,11 @@ static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
> >
> > - return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> > + /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> > + if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
>
> I see no reason for read_id_reg() to take raz as an argument.
> Perhaps having read_id_reg() call sysreg_visible_as_raz() instead
> might make those functions even simpler?
Good point, as this patch has done away with caller-specified RAZ. I'll
incorporate that into v2.
--
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Remove internal accessor helpers for id regs
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:45:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yw5MqMvqwPXBPE0a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeT=FwxN=UtVGO+85iZNRkGEoZ7GQ_WB4FAhHBRnCKoPNXHVg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Reiji,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:45:09PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:48 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > The internal accessors are only ever called once. Dump out their
> > contents in the caller.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 46 ++++++++++-----------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index e18efb9211f0..26210f3a0b27 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -1153,25 +1153,17 @@ static unsigned int raz_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >
> > /* cpufeature ID register access trap handlers */
> >
> > -static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *r,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - if (p->is_write)
> > - return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > -
> > - p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > static bool access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, r);
> >
> > - return __access_id_reg(vcpu, p, r, raz);
> > + if (p->is_write)
> > + return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > +
> > + p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> > + return true;
> > }
> >
> > /* Visibility overrides for SVE-specific control registers */
> > @@ -1226,31 +1218,13 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
> > * to be changed.
> > */
> > -static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 *val,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > - const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 val,
> > - bool raz)
> > -{
> > - /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> > - if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > u64 *val)
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
> >
> > - return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> > + *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > @@ -1258,7 +1232,11 @@ static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > {
> > bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
> >
> > - return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> > + /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> > + if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
>
> I see no reason for read_id_reg() to take raz as an argument.
> Perhaps having read_id_reg() call sysreg_visible_as_raz() instead
> might make those functions even simpler?
Good point, as this patch has done away with caller-specified RAZ. I'll
incorporate that into v2.
--
Best,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-30 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-17 21:48 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: arm64: Treat 32bit ID registers as RAZ/WI on 64bit-only system Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: arm64: Use visibility hook to treat ID regs as RAZ Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 4:54 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-30 4:54 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-30 4:54 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Remove internal accessor helpers for id regs Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 5:45 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-30 5:45 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-30 5:45 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-30 17:45 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-08-30 17:45 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 17:45 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: Spin off helper for calling visibility hook Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-30 6:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-30 6:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-30 6:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Add a visibility bit to ignore user writes Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-31 3:29 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-31 3:29 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-31 3:29 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-31 14:42 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-31 14:42 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-31 14:42 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-01 4:57 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-09-01 4:57 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-09-01 4:57 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: arm64: Treat 32bit ID registers as RAZ/WI on 64bit-only system Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-23 17:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-23 17:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-23 17:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-23 17:27 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-23 17:27 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-23 17:27 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: selftests: Add test for RAZ/WI AArch32 ID registers Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-17 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yw5MqMvqwPXBPE0a@google.com \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.