From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] qemu-options: try and clarify preferred block semantics
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:37:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwNccrTnnIfshz80@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819174757.3551361-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 06:47:57PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Try to correct any confusion about QEMU's Byzantine disk options by
> laying out the preferred "modern" options as-per:
>
> "<danpb> (best: -device + -blockdev, 2nd obsolete syntax: -device +
> -drive, 3rd obsolete syntax: -drive, 4th obsolete syntax: -hdNN)"
Hmm, i guess my numbering of obsolete syntaxes was off-by-1 as
I missed a "1st obsolete syntax" :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
> Cc: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> qemu-options.hx | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 17:47 [RFC PATCH] qemu-options: try and clarify preferred block semantics Alex Bennée
2022-08-22 9:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-08-22 10:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-08-22 10:42 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwNccrTnnIfshz80@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.