All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
	seanjc@google.com, oupton@google.com, ricarkol@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize which pages are written vs read.
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:13:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwlFcGn4w34uXPQd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817214146.3285106-3-coltonlewis@google.com>

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:41:45PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> Randomize which tables are written vs read using the random number
> arrays. Change the variable wr_fract and associated function calls to
> write_percent that now operates as a percentage from 0 to 100 where X
> means each page has an X% chance of being written. Change the -f
> argument to -w to reflect the new variable semantics. Keep the same
> default of 100 percent writes.

Doesn't the new option cause like a 1000x slowdown in "Dirty memory
time"?  I don't think we should merge this until that is understood and
addressed (and it should be at least called out here so that reviewers
can be made aware).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c       | 28 ++++++++++---------
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h    |  4 +--
>  .../selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c        |  9 +++---
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> index 1c2749b1481a..e87696b60e0f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static void run_iteration(struct kvm_vm *vm, int nr_vcpus, const char *descripti
>  static void access_memory(struct kvm_vm *vm, int nr_vcpus,
>  			  enum access_type access, const char *description)
>  {
> -	perf_test_set_wr_fract(vm, (access == ACCESS_READ) ? INT_MAX : 1);
> +	perf_test_set_write_percent(vm, (access == ACCESS_READ) ? 0 : 100);
>  	iteration_work = ITERATION_ACCESS_MEMORY;
>  	run_iteration(vm, nr_vcpus, description);
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> index 362b946019e9..9226eeea79bc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> @@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ static void vcpu_worker(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args)
>  struct test_params {
>  	unsigned long iterations;
>  	uint64_t phys_offset;
> -	int wr_fract;
>  	bool partition_vcpu_memory_access;
>  	enum vm_mem_backing_src_type backing_src;
>  	int slots;
> +	uint32_t write_percent;
>  	uint32_t random_seed;
>  };
>  
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
>  				 p->partition_vcpu_memory_access);
>  
>  	perf_test_set_random_seed(vm, p->random_seed);
> -	perf_test_set_wr_fract(vm, p->wr_fract);
> +	perf_test_set_write_percent(vm, p->write_percent);
>  
>  	guest_num_pages = (nr_vcpus * guest_percpu_mem_size) >> vm->page_shift;
>  	guest_num_pages = vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(mode, guest_num_pages);
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static void help(char *name)
>  	puts("");
>  	printf("usage: %s [-h] [-i iterations] [-p offset] [-g] "
>  	       "[-m mode] [-n] [-b vcpu bytes] [-v vcpus] [-o] [-r random seed ] [-s mem type]"
> -	       "[-x memslots]\n", name);
> +	       "[-x memslots] [-w percentage]\n", name);
>  	puts("");
>  	printf(" -i: specify iteration counts (default: %"PRIu64")\n",
>  	       TEST_HOST_LOOP_N);
> @@ -375,10 +375,6 @@ static void help(char *name)
>  	printf(" -b: specify the size of the memory region which should be\n"
>  	       "     dirtied by each vCPU. e.g. 10M or 3G.\n"
>  	       "     (default: 1G)\n");
> -	printf(" -f: specify the fraction of pages which should be written to\n"
> -	       "     as opposed to simply read, in the form\n"
> -	       "     1/<fraction of pages to write>.\n"
> -	       "     (default: 1 i.e. all pages are written to.)\n");
>  	printf(" -v: specify the number of vCPUs to run.\n");
>  	printf(" -o: Overlap guest memory accesses instead of partitioning\n"
>  	       "     them into a separate region of memory for each vCPU.\n");
> @@ -386,6 +382,11 @@ static void help(char *name)
>  	backing_src_help("-s");
>  	printf(" -x: Split the memory region into this number of memslots.\n"
>  	       "     (default: 1)\n");
> +	printf(" -w: specify the percentage of pages which should be written to\n"
> +	       "     as an integer from 0-100 inclusive. This is probabalistic,\n"
> +	       "     so -w X means each page has an X%% chance of writing\n"
> +	       "     and a (100-X)%% chance of reading.\n"
> +	       "     (default: 100 i.e. all pages are written to.)\n");
>  	puts("");
>  	exit(0);
>  }
> @@ -395,10 +396,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  	int max_vcpus = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS);
>  	struct test_params p = {
>  		.iterations = TEST_HOST_LOOP_N,
> -		.wr_fract = 1,
>  		.partition_vcpu_memory_access = true,
>  		.backing_src = DEFAULT_VM_MEM_SRC,
>  		.slots = 1,
> +		.write_percent = 100,
>  		.random_seed = time(NULL),
>  	};
>  	int opt;
> @@ -410,7 +411,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>  	guest_modes_append_default();
>  
> -	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "eghi:p:m:nb:f:v:or:s:x:")) != -1) {
> +	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "eghi:p:m:nb:v:or:s:x:w:")) != -1) {
>  		switch (opt) {
>  		case 'e':
>  			/* 'e' is for evil. */
> @@ -433,10 +434,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  		case 'b':
>  			guest_percpu_mem_size = parse_size(optarg);
>  			break;
> -		case 'f':
> -			p.wr_fract = atoi(optarg);
> -			TEST_ASSERT(p.wr_fract >= 1,
> -				    "Write fraction cannot be less than one");
> +		case 'w':
> +			perf_test_args.write_percent = atoi(optarg);
> +			TEST_ASSERT(perf_test_args.write_percent >= 0
> +				    && perf_test_args.write_percent <= 100,
> +				    "Write percentage must be between 0 and 100");

perf_test_create_vm() overwrites this with 100. Did you mean
p.write_percent?

>  			break;
>  		case 'v':
>  			nr_vcpus = atoi(optarg);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> index 9517956424fc..8da4a839c585 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct perf_test_args {
>  	uint64_t size;
>  	uint64_t guest_page_size;
>  	uint32_t random_seed;
> -	int wr_fract;
> +	int write_percent;
>  
>  	/* Run vCPUs in L2 instead of L1, if the architecture supports it. */
>  	bool nested;
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct kvm_vm *perf_test_create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int nr_vcpus,
>  				   bool partition_vcpu_memory_access);
>  void perf_test_destroy_vm(struct kvm_vm *vm);
>  
> -void perf_test_set_wr_fract(struct kvm_vm *vm, int wr_fract);
> +void perf_test_set_write_percent(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t write_percent);
>  void perf_test_set_random_seed(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t random_seed);
>  
>  void perf_test_start_vcpu_threads(int vcpus, void (*vcpu_fn)(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *));
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> index 8d85923acb4e..1a6b69713337 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
>  	struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args = &pta->vcpu_args[vcpu_idx];
>  	uint64_t gva;
>  	uint64_t pages;
> +	uint32_t *rnd_arr = (uint32_t *)vcpu_args->random_array;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	gva = vcpu_args->gva;
> @@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ void perf_test_guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_idx)
>  		for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
>  			uint64_t addr = gva + (i * pta->guest_page_size);
>  
> -			if (i % pta->wr_fract == 0)
> +			if (rnd_arr[i] % 100 < pta->write_percent)
>  				*(uint64_t *)addr = 0x0123456789ABCDEF;
>  			else
>  				READ_ONCE(*(uint64_t *)addr);
> @@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ struct kvm_vm *perf_test_create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int nr_vcpus,
>  	pr_info("Testing guest mode: %s\n", vm_guest_mode_string(mode));
>  
>  	/* Set perf_test_args defaults. */
> -	pta->wr_fract = 100;
> +	pta->write_percent = 100;
>  	pta->random_seed = time(NULL);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -258,9 +259,9 @@ void perf_test_destroy_vm(struct kvm_vm *vm)
>  	kvm_vm_free(vm);
>  }
>  
> -void perf_test_set_wr_fract(struct kvm_vm *vm, int wr_fract)
> +void perf_test_set_write_percent(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t write_percent)
>  {
> -	perf_test_args.wr_fract = wr_fract;
> +	perf_test_args.write_percent = write_percent;
>  	sync_global_to_guest(vm, perf_test_args);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-26 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17 21:41 [PATCH v2 0/3] Randomize memory access of dirty_log_perf_test Colton Lewis
2022-08-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: selftests: Create source of randomness for guest code Colton Lewis
2022-08-26 21:58   ` David Matlack
2022-08-30 19:01     ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-01 17:52       ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-01 18:22         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-02 11:20           ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-01 17:37   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize which pages are written vs read Colton Lewis
2022-08-26 22:13   ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-08-30 19:02     ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-08 18:51       ` David Matlack
2022-09-08 19:46         ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-08 19:52           ` David Matlack
2022-08-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: selftests: Randomize page access order Colton Lewis
2022-08-18 21:41   ` Colton Lewis
2022-08-26 22:20   ` David Matlack
2022-08-30 19:02     ` Colton Lewis
2022-09-01 17:43   ` Ricardo Koller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwlFcGn4w34uXPQd@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.