All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Richard W . M . Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
	ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] Docs: ublk: add ublk document
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:13:06 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxHJIjaS6D+titXR@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901133022.698343-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13473 bytes --]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:30:22PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Add documentation for ublk subsystem. It was supposed to be documented when
> merging the driver, but missing at that time.
> 

The subject line should be "Documentation: document ublk"

> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +===========================================
> +Userspace block device driver (ublk driver)
> +===========================================
> +
> +Overview
> +========
> +
> +ublk is a generic framework for implementing block device logic from userspace.
> +The motivation behind it is moving virtual block drivers into userspace,
> +such as loop, nbd and similar can be very helpful. It can help to implement
> +new virtual block device such as ublk-qcow2 (there was several attempts of
> +implementing qcow2 driver in kernel).
> +
> +Userspace block devices are attractive because:
> +
> +- They can be written many programming languages.
> +- They can use libraries that are not available in the kernel.
> +- They can be debugged with tools familiar to application developers.
> +- Crashes do not kernel panic the machine.
> +- Bugs are likely to have a lower security impact than bugs in kernel
> +  code.
> +- They can be installed and updated independently of the kernel.
> +- They can be used to simulate block device easily with user specified
> +  parameters/setting for test/debug purpose
> +
> +ublk block device (``/dev/ublkb*``) is added by ublk driver. Any IO request
> +on the device will be forwarded to ublk userspace program. For convenience,
> +in this document, ``ublk server`` refers to generic ublk userspace
> +program. ``ublksrv`` [#userspace]_ is one of such implementation. It
> +provides ``libublksrv`` [#userspace_lib]_ library for developing specific
> +user block device conveniently, while also generic type block device is
> +included, such as loop and null. Richard W.M. Jones wrote userspace nbd device
> +``nbdublk`` [#userspace_nbdublk]_  based on ``libublksrv`` [#userspace_lib]_.
> +
> +After the IO is handled by userspace, the result is committed back to the
> +driver, thus completing the request cycle. This way, any specific IO handling
> +logic is totally done by userspace, such as loop's IO handling, NBD's IO
> +communication, or qcow2's IO mapping.
> +
> +``/dev/ublkb*`` is driven by blk-mq request-based driver. Each request is
> +assigned by one queue wide unique tag. ublk server assigns unique tag to each
> +IO too, which is 1:1 mapped with IO of ``/dev/ublkb*``.
> +
> +Both the IO request forward and IO handling result committing are done via
> +``io_uring`` passthrough command; that is why ublk is also one io_uring based
> +block driver. It has been observed that using io_uring passthrough command can
> +give better IOPS than block IO; which is why ublk is one of high performance
> +implementation of userspace block device: not only IO request communication is
> +done by io_uring, but also the preferred IO handling in ublk server is io_uring
> +based approach too.
> +
> +ublk provides control interface to set/get ublk block device parameters.
> +The interface is extendable and kabi compatible: basically any ublk request
> +queue's parameter or ublk generic feature parameters can be set/get via the
> +interface. Thus, ublk is generic userspace block device framework.
> +For example, it is easy to setup a ublk device with specified block
> +parameters from userspace.
> +
> +Using ublk
> +==========
> +
> +ublk requires userspace ublk server to handle real block device logic.
> +
> +Below is example of using ``ublksrv`` to provide ublk-based loop device.
> +
> +- add a device::
> +
> +     ublk add -t loop -f ublk-loop.img
> +
> +- format with xfs, then use it::
> +
> +     mkfs.xfs /dev/ublkb0
> +     mount /dev/ublkb0 /mnt
> +     # do anything. all IOs are handled by io_uring
> +     ...
> +     umount /mnt
> +
> +- list the devices with their info::
> +
> +     ublk list
> +
> +- delete the device::
> +
> +     ublk del -a
> +     ublk del -n $ublk_dev_id
> +
> +See usage details in README of ``ublksrv`` [#userspace_readme]_.
> +
> +Design
> +======
> +
> +Control plane
> +-------------
> +
> +ublk driver provides global misc device node (``/dev/ublk-control``) for
> +managing and controlling ublk devices with help of several control commands:
> +
> +- ``UBLK_CMD_ADD_DEV``
> +
> +  Add a ublk char device (``/dev/ublkc*``) which is talked with ublk server
> +  WRT IO command communication. Basic device info is sent together with this
> +  command. It sets UAPI structure of ``ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info``,
> +  such as ``nr_hw_queues``, ``queue_depth``, and max IO request buffer size,
> +  for which the info is negotiated with the driver and sent back to the server.
> +  When this command is completed, the basic device info is immutable.
> +
> +- ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` / ``UBLK_CMD_GET_PARAMS``
> +
> +  Set or get parameters of the device, which can be either generic feature
> +  related, or request queue limit related, but can't be IO logic specific,
> +  because the driver does not handle any IO logic. This command has to be
> +  sent before sending ``UBLK_CMD_START_DEV``.
> +
> +- ``UBLK_CMD_START_DEV``
> +
> +  After the server prepares userspace resources (such as creating per-queue
> +  pthread & io_uring for handling ublk IO), this command is sent to the
> +  driver for allocating & exposing ``/dev/ublkb*``. Parameters set via
> +  ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` are applied for creating the device.
> +
> +- ``UBLK_CMD_STOP_DEV``
> +
> +  Halt IO on ``/dev/ublkb*`` and remove the device. When this command returns,
> +  ublk server will release resources (such as destroying per-queue pthread &
> +  io_uring).
> +
> +- ``UBLK_CMD_DEL_DEV``
> +
> +  Remove ``/dev/ublkc*``. When this command returns, the allocated ublk device
> +  number can be reused.
> +
> +- ``UBLK_CMD_GET_QUEUE_AFFINITY``
> +
> +  When ``/dev/ublkc`` is added, the driver creates block layer tagset, so
> +  that each queue's affinity info is available. The server sends
> +  ``UBLK_CMD_GET_QUEUE_AFFINITY`` to retrieve queue affinity info. It can
> +  set up the per-queue context efficiently, such as bind affine CPUs with IO
> +  pthread and try to allocate buffers in IO thread context.
> +
> +- ``UBLK_CMD_GET_DEV_INFO``
> +
> +  For retrieving device info via ``ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info``. It is the server's
> +  responsibility to save IO target specific info in userspace.
> +
> +Data plane
> +----------
> +
> +ublk server needs to create per-queue IO pthread & io_uring for handling IO
> +commands via io_uring passthrough. The per-queue IO pthread
> +focuses on IO handling and shouldn't handle any control & management
> +tasks.
> +
> +The's IO is assigned by a unique tag, which is 1:1 mapping with IO
> +request of ``/dev/ublkb*``.
> +
> +UAPI structure of ``ublksrv_io_desc`` is defined for describing each IO from
> +ublk driver. A fixed mmaped area (array) on ``/dev/ublkc*`` is provided for
> +exporting IO info to the server; such as IO offset, length, OP/flags and
> +buffer address. Each ``ublksrv_io_desc`` instance can be indexed via queue id
> +and IO tag directly.
> +
> +The following IO commands are communicated via io_uring passthrough command,
> +and each command is only for forwarding ublk IO and committing IO result
> +with specified IO tag in the command data:
> +
> +- ``UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ``
> +
> +  Sent from the server IO pthread for fetching future incoming IO requests
> +  destined to ``/dev/ublkb*``. This command is sent only once from the server
> +  IO pthread for ublk driver to setup IO forward environment.
> +
> +- ``UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ``
> +
> +  When an IO request is destined to ``/dev/ublkb*``, the driver stores
> +  the IO's ``ublksrv_io_desc`` to the specified mapped area; then the
> +  previous received IO command of this IO tag (either ``UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ``
> +  or ``UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ)`` is completed, so the server gets
> +  the IO notification via io_uring.
> +
> +  After the server handles the IO, its result is committed back to the
> +  driver by sending ``UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ`` back. Once ublkdrv
> +  received this command, it parses the result and complete the request to
> +  ``/dev/ublkb*``. In the meantime setup environment for fetching future
> +  requests with the same IO tag. That is, ``UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ``
> +  is reused for both fetching request and committing back IO result.
> +
> +- ``UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA``
> +
> +  With ``UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA`` enabled, the WRITE request will be firstly
> +  issued to ublk server without data copy. Then, IO backend of ublk server
> +  receives the request and it can allocate data buffer and embed its addr
> +  inside this new io command. After the kernel driver gets the command,
> +  data copy is done from request pages to this backend's buffer. Finally,
> +  backend receives the request again with data to be written and it can
> +  truly handle the request.
> +
> +  ``UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA`` adds one additional round-trip and one
> +  io_uring_enter() syscall. Any user thinks that it may lower performance
> +  should not enable UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA. ublk server pre-allocates IO
> +  buffer for each IO by default. Any new project should try to use this
> +  buffer to communicate with ublk driver. However, existing project may
> +  break or not able to consume the new buffer interface; that's why this
> +  command is added for backwards compatibility so that existing projects
> +  can still consume existing buffers.
> +
> +- data copy between ublk server IO buffer and ublk block IO request
> +
> +  The driver needs to copy the block IO request pages into the server buffer
> +  (pages) first for WRITE before notifying the server of the coming IO, so
> +  that the server can handle WRITE request.
> +
> +  When the server handles READ request and sends
> +  ``UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ`` to the server, ublkdrv needs to copy
> +  the server buffer (pages) read to the IO request pages.
> +
> +Future development
> +==================
> +
> +Container-aware ublk deivice
> +----------------------------
> +
> +ublk driver doesn't handle any IO logic. Its function is well defined
> +for now and very limited userspace interfaces are needed, which is also
> +well defined too. It is possible to make ublk devices container-aware block
> +devices in future as Stefan Hajnoczi suggested [#stefan]_, by removing
> +ADMIN privilege.
> +
> +Zero copy
> +---------
> +
> +Zero copy is a generic requirement for nbd, fuse or similar drivers. A
> +problem [#xiaoguang]_ Xiaoguang mentioned is that pages mapped to userspace
> +can't be remapped any more in kernel with existing mm interfaces. This can
> +occurs when destining direct IO to ``/dev/ublkb*``. Also he reported that
> +big requests (>= 256 KB IO) may benefit a lot from zero copy.
> +
> +

I also have minor grammatical fixes:

---- >8 ----

diff --git a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
index a102f4c1ab2eb4..2122d1a4a54196 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
+++ b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ Overview
 ========
 
 ublk is a generic framework for implementing block device logic from userspace.
-The motivation behind it is moving virtual block drivers into userspace,
+The motivation behind it is that moving virtual block drivers into userspace,
 such as loop, nbd and similar can be very helpful. It can help to implement
-new virtual block device such as ublk-qcow2 (there was several attempts of
+new virtual block device such as ublk-qcow2 (there are several attempts of
 implementing qcow2 driver in kernel).
 
 Userspace block devices are attractive because:
@@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ The's IO is assigned by a unique tag, which is 1:1 mapping with IO
 request of ``/dev/ublkb*``.
 
 UAPI structure of ``ublksrv_io_desc`` is defined for describing each IO from
-ublk driver. A fixed mmaped area (array) on ``/dev/ublkc*`` is provided for
+the driver. A fixed mmaped area (array) on ``/dev/ublkc*`` is provided for
 exporting IO info to the server; such as IO offset, length, OP/flags and
 buffer address. Each ``ublksrv_io_desc`` instance can be indexed via queue id
 and IO tag directly.
 
 The following IO commands are communicated via io_uring passthrough command,
-and each command is only for forwarding ublk IO and committing IO result
+and each command is only for forwarding the IO and committing the result
 with specified IO tag in the command data:
 
 - ``UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ``
@@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ Zero copy
 Zero copy is a generic requirement for nbd, fuse or similar drivers. A
 problem [#xiaoguang]_ Xiaoguang mentioned is that pages mapped to userspace
 can't be remapped any more in kernel with existing mm interfaces. This can
-occurs when destining direct IO to ``/dev/ublkb*``. Also he reported that
-big requests (>= 256 KB IO) may benefit a lot from zero copy.
+occurs when destining direct IO to ``/dev/ublkb*``. Also, he reported that
+big requests (IO size >= 256 KB) may benefit a lot from zero copy.
 
 
 References

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 13:30 [PATCH V3 1/1] Docs: ublk: add ublk document Ming Lei
2022-09-02  6:01 ` Ziyang Zhang
2022-09-02  9:13 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YxHJIjaS6D+titXR@debian.me \
    --to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.