From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Mayuresh Chitale" <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>,
"Atish Patra" <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
"Jessica Clarke" <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>,
"kernel test robot" <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:34:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxdocNmsC3hQGNhy@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220906074509.928865-3-ajones@ventanamicro.com>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:45:09AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>
> This fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to
> the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could
> fire on an uninitialized hart ID.
>
> The biggest change here is that riscv_cbom_block_size is no longer
> initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA
> that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will
> just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems. This also
> changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before
> enabling Zicbom support.
>
> Fixes: 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
> Fixes: 1631ba1259d6 ("riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> [Rebased on Anup's move patch and applied Conor Dooley's and Heiko
> Stuebner's changes.]
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
I can confirm that that the second issue appears to be resolved, as I
no longer see the instance of -Wsometimes-initialized from clang:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1689
Build-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Hopefully this can be queued up for 6.0.
> ---
> arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> index 202c83f677b2..96648c176f37 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static bool errata_probe_cmo(unsigned int stage,
> if (stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT)
> return false;
>
> + riscv_cbom_block_size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
> riscv_noncoherent_supported();
> return true;
> #else
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 95ef6e2bf45c..2dfc463b86bb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> setup_smp();
> #endif
>
> - riscv_fill_hwcap();
> riscv_init_cbom_blocksize();
> + riscv_fill_hwcap();
> apply_boot_alternatives();
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> index 336c5deea870..e5b087be1577 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> @@ -89,39 +89,40 @@ void flush_icache_pte(pte_t pte)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>
> -unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
> +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> {
> struct device_node *node;
> + unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> + u32 val, probed_block_size;
> int ret;
> - u32 val;
>
> + probed_block_size = 0;
> for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> unsigned long hartid;
> - int cbom_hartid;
>
> ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> if (ret)
> continue;
>
> - if (hartid < 0)
> - continue;
> -
> /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> if (ret)
> continue;
>
> - if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) {
> - riscv_cbom_block_size = val;
> + if (!probed_block_size) {
> + probed_block_size = val;
> cbom_hartid = hartid;
> } else {
> - if (riscv_cbom_block_size != val)
> - pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %d and %lu\n",
> + if (probed_block_size != val)
> + pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> cbom_hartid, hartid);
> }
> }
> +
> + if (probed_block_size)
> + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> index 3f502a1a68b1..d919efab6eba 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> @@ -74,5 +74,7 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>
> void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
> {
> + WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
> + "Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n");
> noncoherent_supported = true;
> }
> --
> 2.37.2
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-06 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 7:45 [PATCH v3 0/2] Zicbom block size fixes and cleanups Andrew Jones
2022-09-06 7:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] RISC-V: Move riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() to cacheflush.c Andrew Jones
2022-09-06 7:51 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-09-06 7:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-09-06 7:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing Andrew Jones
2022-09-06 8:33 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-09-06 15:34 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
[not found] ` <CAOnJCULO-pSNgsvXMbCiOi72jJmOvB_UGGw87psynbXgo1K_3A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-09-08 7:11 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-08 7:50 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-09-08 7:53 ` Atish Patra
2022-09-08 8:10 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-09-08 10:05 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-08 10:48 ` Jessica Clarke
2022-09-08 11:22 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-08 11:37 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-09-08 17:57 ` Atish Patra
2022-09-08 23:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Zicbom block size fixes and cleanups Palmer Dabbelt
2022-09-08 23:20 ` Conor.Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxdocNmsC3hQGNhy@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jrtc27@jrtc27.com \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mchitale@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.