From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>,
Camelia Alexandra Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:14:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyDBdn+IHqConzIW@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de50858e-0056-fd72-2b67-27bf597b3366@seco.com>
On 09-09-22, 11:05, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> I noticed in patchwork [1] that this entire series is marked as "Changes
> Requested," despite having received only automated feedback on one patch
> in the series. I am concerned about this because last time this occurred
> [2], the series received no feedback for a month. I suspect this is
> because series marked "Changes Requested" are hidden in patchwork by
> default. Can you change the status of this series back to new? Or should
> I just resend again?
Yes please, update with ack collected any feedback addressed would be
right...
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=673741&state=*
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=665484&state=*
--
~Vinod
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>,
Camelia Alexandra Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:14:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyDBdn+IHqConzIW@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de50858e-0056-fd72-2b67-27bf597b3366@seco.com>
On 09-09-22, 11:05, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> I noticed in patchwork [1] that this entire series is marked as "Changes
> Requested," despite having received only automated feedback on one patch
> in the series. I am concerned about this because last time this occurred
> [2], the series received no feedback for a month. I suspect this is
> because series marked "Changes Requested" are hidden in patchwork by
> default. Can you change the status of this series back to new? Or should
> I just resend again?
Yes please, update with ack collected any feedback addressed would be
right...
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=673741&state=*
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=665484&state=*
--
~Vinod
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Camelia Alexandra Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:14:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyDBdn+IHqConzIW@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de50858e-0056-fd72-2b67-27bf597b3366@seco.com>
On 09-09-22, 11:05, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> I noticed in patchwork [1] that this entire series is marked as "Changes
> Requested," despite having received only automated feedback on one patch
> in the series. I am concerned about this because last time this occurred
> [2], the series received no feedback for a month. I suspect this is
> because series marked "Changes Requested" are hidden in patchwork by
> default. Can you change the status of this series back to new? Or should
> I just resend again?
Yes please, update with ack collected any feedback addressed would be
right...
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=673741&state=*
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=665484&state=*
--
~Vinod
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>,
Camelia Alexandra Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:14:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyDBdn+IHqConzIW@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de50858e-0056-fd72-2b67-27bf597b3366@seco.com>
On 09-09-22, 11:05, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> I noticed in patchwork [1] that this entire series is marked as "Changes
> Requested," despite having received only automated feedback on one patch
> in the series. I am concerned about this because last time this occurred
> [2], the series received no feedback for a month. I suspect this is
> because series marked "Changes Requested" are hidden in patchwork by
> default. Can you change the status of this series back to new? Or should
> I just resend again?
Yes please, update with ack collected any feedback addressed would be
right...
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=673741&state=*
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/list/?series=665484&state=*
--
~Vinod
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-13 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-02 21:37 [PATCH v5 0/8] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: Add 2500BASE-X and 10GBASE-R Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-12 19:49 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:49 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:49 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:49 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] dt-bindings: phy: Add Lynx 10G phy binding Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-12 19:46 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:46 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:46 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:46 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] dt-bindings: clock: Add ids for Lynx 10g PLLs Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-12 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-12 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] phy: fsl: Add Lynx 10G SerDes driver Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-03 15:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-03 15:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-03 15:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-03 15:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-06 16:33 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-06 16:33 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-06 16:33 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-06 16:33 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-06 16:33 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] arm64: dts: ls1046a: Add serdes bindings Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] arm64: dts: ls1088a: " Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: dts: ls1046ardb: " Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] [WIP] arm64: dts: ls1088ardb: " Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-02 21:37 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-09 15:05 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes Sean Anderson
2022-09-09 15:05 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-09 15:05 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-09 15:05 ` Sean Anderson
2022-09-13 17:44 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2022-09-13 17:44 ` Vinod Koul
2022-09-13 17:44 ` Vinod Koul
2022-09-13 17:44 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyDBdn+IHqConzIW@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=camelia.groza@nxp.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=madalin.bucur@nxp.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.