From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CEF10E8B9 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 10:47:56 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: "Modem, Bhanuprakash" Message-ID: References: <20220831101100.1242315-1-mwen@igalia.com> <20220919155421.nauj7e4dp2dwmqza@mail.igalia.com> <9c8f18bc-a815-84a0-93eb-698a4083bbe0@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <9c8f18bc-a815-84a0-93eb-698a4083bbe0@intel.com> Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_color: fix crc assert condition List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, petri.latvala@intel.com Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 03:32:39PM +0530, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote: > On Mon-19-09-2022 09:24 pm, Melissa Wen wrote: > > On 09/01, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote: > >> On Wed-31-08-2022 03:41 pm, Melissa Wen wrote: > >>> In test_pipe_degamma/gamma/ctm, igt_assert_crc_equal() was replaced by > >>> > >>> ret = !igt_skip_crc_compare || igt_check_crc_equal() > >>> and then igt_assert(ret) > >>> > >>> where igt_check_crc_equal returns !mismatch, and therefore we can > >>> translate as: > >>> > >>> ret = !igt_skip_crc_compare || !mismatch > >>> > >>> However, the original igt_assert_crc_equal() assertion does: > >>> > >>> igt_assert(!mismatch || igt_skip_crc_compare) > >>> > >>> That means, the replacement changes the original assertion. Moreover, > >>> negating `igt_skip_crc_compare` makes the test assertion to be always > >>> true (sucessful) by default and reverses the logic of > >>> --skip-crc-compare. > >>> > >>> Fixes: d61e4598142 ("tests/kms_color: Convert tests to dynamic") > >>> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen > >> > >> LGTM > >> Reviewed-by: Bhanuprakash Modem > >> > >> - Bhanu > > > > Thanks for reviewing, Bhanu. > > > > Siqueira, > > > > Is it okay from AMD side? If so, can you apply it? > > Applied. It did _not_ pass CI and so should not have been pushed! -- Ville Syrjälä Intel