From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E73C6FA86 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E863CAD62 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876D63C9111 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:56:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98F31A0148B for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:56:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D635B1F747; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:56:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1663840617; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7NFSG7T1LLGCbS7gRiF0WaLyTb1OLBg6rE49igDP7cw=; b=apeGYcHzbc4GbtxIjIjv5mHOgq1F3pjQYs98ZXVsdEQkYQcKIzQjDeoj1kBz831Oo73lLl eUukTSQWZ+R6MOZoT9pHtR3/mvIk+qXfHHqSYNDuNZUYDqLhdKl4DggmWMRFlrOozWzc/0 1GnOvQFPu7+IaRWryVYooCmJvGeJOc8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1663840617; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7NFSG7T1LLGCbS7gRiF0WaLyTb1OLBg6rE49igDP7cw=; b=ioB7ei5+AZ45PvUt+/FGGQglgi8Hjr6jLEXagEktOOSPVwj8AsGsAgSzy/JVlXnNeLKgFH RCsODOKUtdP/RoCA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC59B1346B; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id Z/evI2kxLGNODwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:56:57 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:56:55 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20220921155006.13360-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] tst_supported_fs: Implement checking paths against skiplist X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" ... > > Yes, that's not related. I changed it in eb47b4497 ("tst_supported_fs: > > Support > > skip list when query single fs") as with 32 one can detect it's TCONF. > > As long as 0 is success, non-zero for failure. > Looks like there is no difference to use whatever 32 or 1, as long as > it's a non-zero, it will work well in the shell. > Ok, I agree to update the doc (also usage() should be updated) later. +1, I actually meant usage() in testcases/lib/tst_supported_fs.c. Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp