From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover AMD PMU
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:48:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz4JwQcXIG+sQmp5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819110939.78013-14-likexu@tencent.com>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
> index 0324220..10bca27 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/processor.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
> @@ -793,6 +793,9 @@ static inline void flush_tlb(void)
>
> static inline u8 pmu_version(void)
> {
> + if (!is_intel())
> + return 0;
> +
> return cpuid(10).a & 0xff;
> }
>
> @@ -806,19 +809,39 @@ static inline bool this_cpu_has_perf_global_ctrl(void)
> return pmu_version() > 1;
> }
>
> +#define AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS 4
> +#define AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE 6
> +
> +static inline bool has_amd_perfctr_core(void)
> +{
> + return cpuid(0x80000001).c & BIT_ULL(23);
Add an X86_FEATURE_*, maybe X86_FEATURE_AMD_PERF_EXTENSIONS?
> +}
> +
> static inline u8 pmu_nr_gp_counters(void)
> {
> - return (cpuid(10).a >> 8) & 0xff;
> + if (is_intel()) {
No curly braces.
> + return (cpuid(10).a >> 8) & 0xff;
> + } else if (!has_amd_perfctr_core()) {
Drop the "else", the above "if" is terminal.
> + return AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS;
> + }
> +
> + return AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE;
> }
>
> static inline u8 pmu_gp_counter_width(void)
> {
> - return (cpuid(10).a >> 16) & 0xff;
> + if (is_intel())
> + return (cpuid(10).a >> 16) & 0xff;
> + else
> + return 48;
Please add a #define for this magic number.
> }
>
> static inline u8 pmu_gp_counter_mask_length(void)
> {
> - return (cpuid(10).a >> 24) & 0xff;
> + if (is_intel())
> + return (cpuid(10).a >> 24) & 0xff;
> + else
> + return pmu_nr_gp_counters();
> }
>
> static inline u8 pmu_nr_fixed_counters(void)
> @@ -843,6 +866,9 @@ static inline u8 pmu_fixed_counter_width(void)
>
> static inline bool pmu_gp_counter_is_available(int i)
> {
> + if (!is_intel())
> + return i < pmu_nr_gp_counters();
> +
> /* CPUID.0xA.EBX bit is '1 if they counter is NOT available. */
> return !(cpuid(10).b & BIT(i));
> }
> diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
> index 0706cb1..b6ab10c 100644
> --- a/x86/pmu.c
> +++ b/x86/pmu.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ struct pmu_event {
> {"fixed 1", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
> {"fixed 2", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 1, 1*N, 30*N},
> {"fixed 3", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 2, 0.1*N, 30*N}
> +}, amd_gp_events[] = {
> + {"core cycles", 0x0076, 1*N, 50*N},
> + {"instructions", 0x00c0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
> + {"branches", 0x00c2, 1*N, 1.1*N},
> + {"branch misses", 0x00c3, 0, 0.1*N},
> };
>
> #define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES (1ULL << 13)
> @@ -105,14 +110,24 @@ static bool check_irq(void)
>
> static bool is_gp(pmu_counter_t *evt)
> {
> + if (!is_intel())
> + return true;
> +
> return evt->ctr < MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 ||
> evt->ctr >= MSR_IA32_PMC0;
> }
>
> static int event_to_global_idx(pmu_counter_t *cnt)
> {
> - return cnt->ctr - (is_gp(cnt) ? gp_counter_base :
> - (MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 - FIXED_CNT_INDEX));
> + if (is_intel())
> + return cnt->ctr - (is_gp(cnt) ? gp_counter_base :
> + (MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 - FIXED_CNT_INDEX));
> +
> + if (gp_counter_base == MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0) {
Unnecessary curly braces.
> + return (cnt->ctr - gp_counter_base) / 2;
> + } else {
> + return cnt->ctr - gp_counter_base;
> + }
> }
>
> static struct pmu_event* get_counter_event(pmu_counter_t *cnt)
> @@ -736,5 +783,11 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> + if (!is_intel()) {
> + report_prefix_push("K7");
> + amd_switch_to_non_perfctr_core();
> + check_counters();
"K7" prefix needs to be popped.
> + }
> +
> return report_summary();
> }
> --
> 2.37.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 11:09 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/13] x86/pmu: Test case optimization, fixes and additions Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/13] x86/pmu: Introduce __start_event() to drop all of the manual zeroing Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/13] x86/pmu: Introduce multiple_{one, many}() to improve readability Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/13] x86/pmu: Reset the expected count of the fixed counter 0 when i386 Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-17 7:30 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 19:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/13] x86/pmu: Add tests for Intel Processor Event Based Sampling (PEBS) Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-05 22:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/13] x86: create pmu group for quick pmu-scope testing Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/13] x86/pmu: Test emulation instructions on full-width counters Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/13] x86/pmu: Pop up FW prefix to avoid out-of-context propagation Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/13] x86/pmu: Add PDCM check before accessing PERF_CAP register Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/13] x86/pmu: Report SKIP when testing Intel LBR on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-10-05 22:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover Intel Arch PMU Version 1 Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:15 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:28 ` Like Xu
2022-09-06 8:16 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-06 13:35 ` Like Xu
2022-09-08 8:23 ` Sandipan Das
2022-09-19 7:09 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 7:32 ` Like Xu
2022-10-25 8:34 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-18 9:32 ` Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/13] x86/pmu: Refine message when testing PMU on AMD platforms Like Xu
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/13] x86/pmu: Add assignment framework for Intel-specific HW resources Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:19 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-21 7:21 ` Like Xu
2022-10-21 18:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 11:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/13] x86/pmu: Update testcases to cover AMD PMU Like Xu
2022-09-06 7:32 ` Sandipan Das
2022-10-05 22:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yz4JwQcXIG+sQmp5@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.