All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shane Parslow <shaneparslow808@gmail.com>
To: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: Fix 7360 WWAN card control channel mapping
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:06:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzPkeEE0rbCurF4L@arch-x1c> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB5008658CADCDADE43C6B0D5BD7559@SJ0PR11MB5008.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:43:22PM +0000, Kumar, M Chetan wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shane Parslow <shaneparslow808@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 9:35 AM
> > To: shaneparslow808@gmail.com
> > Cc: Kumar, M Chetan <m.chetan.kumar@intel.com>; linuxwwan
> > <linuxwwan@intel.com>; Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>; Sergey
> > Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>; Johannes Berg
> > <johannes@sipsolutions.net>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric
> > Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>;
> > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: Fix 7360 WWAN card control channel
> > mapping
> > 
> > This patch fixes the control channel mapping for the 7360, which was
> > previously the same as the 7560.
> > 
> > As shown by the reverse engineering efforts of James Wah [1], the layout of
> > channels on the 7360 is actually somewhat different from that of the 7560.
> > 
> > A new ipc_chnl_cfg is added specifically for the 7360. The new config
> > updates channel 7 to be an AT port and removes the mbim interface, as it
> > does not exist on the 7360. The config is otherwise left the same as the
> > 7560. ipc_chnl_cfg_get is updated to switch between the two configs.
> > In ipc_imem, a special case for the mbim port is removed as it no longer
> > exists in the 7360 ipc_chnl_cfg.
> > 
> > As a result of this, the second userspace AT port now functions whereas
> > previously it was routed to the trace channel. Modem crashes ("confused
> > phase", "msg timeout", "PORT open refused") resulting from garbage being
> > sent to the modem are also fixed.
> 
> Trace channel is mapped to 3rd entry.
> 
> /* Trace */
> { IPC_MEM_CTRL_CHL_ID_3, IPC_MEM_PIPE_6, IPC_MEM_PIPE_7,
>   IPC_MEM_TDS_TRC, IPC_MEM_TDS_TRC, IPC_MEM_MAX_DL_TRC_BUF_SIZE,
>   WWAN_PORT_UNKNOWN },
> 
> I cross checked by running AT test on 7360. Both ports are functional as expected.
> We should be able to send or receive AT commands with existing below config. 
> 
> /* IAT0 */
> { IPC_MEM_CTRL_CHL_ID_2, IPC_MEM_PIPE_4, IPC_MEM_PIPE_5,
>   IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_DL_AT_BUF_SIZE,
>   WWAN_PORT_AT },  -----------> wwan0at0
> 
> /* IAT1 */
> { IPC_MEM_CTRL_CHL_ID_4, IPC_MEM_PIPE_8, IPC_MEM_PIPE_9,
>   IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_DL_AT_BUF_SIZE,
>   WWAN_PORT_AT }, ------------> wwan0at1
> 
> Does this second AT port (wwan0at1) goes bad at some point or is always not functional/modem
> crashes sooner we issue AT command ?
> 
> Could you please help to check the modem fw details by running below command.
> at+xgendata

Upon further investigation, it looks like the modem crashes only occur
after S3 sleep, and are likely a different issue that this patch does
not fix. Sorry for the confusion.

I say that the channels are mapped incorrectly because upon opening
wwan0at0, I recieve "+XLCSINIT: UtaLcsInitializeRspCb received result = 0",
and no response to AT commands. The behavior I would expect, and the
behavior I get after applying the patch, is normal responses to AT
commands in the same way as wwan0at1 pre-patch.

To be clear, my patch points wwan0at0 to channel 4, and wwan0at1 to channel
7. I have perhaps been ambiguous with the terms I have been using.

To recap:
-- The modem crashes are likely an unrelated issue.
-- wwan0at0 is currently unresponsive to commands, and outputs
   "+XLCSINIT...", but responds normally post-patch.

AT+XGENDATA returns the following:
+XGENDATA: "XG736ES21S5E20NAMAV2DEFA19223101408
M2_7360_XMM7360_REV_2.1_RPC_NAND 2019-May-29 11:40:45
*XG736ES21S5E20NAMAV2DEFA19223101408__M.2_7360_MR2_01.1920.00*"
"*"
"FAB-CODE:7*SDRAMVendor=0x08 (Winbond), SDRAMRevision=0x0000"

I don't see any firmware updates online.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-28  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-26  4:05 [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: Fix 7360 WWAN card control channel mapping Shane Parslow
2022-09-26 20:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-26 20:51   ` Shane Parslow
2022-09-26 21:37     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-26 22:21       ` Shane Parslow
2022-09-27 13:59         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-27 13:43 ` Kumar, M Chetan
2022-09-28  6:06   ` Shane Parslow [this message]
2022-10-21 14:04     ` Kumar, M Chetan
2022-10-21 23:54       ` Shane Parslow
2022-10-20 19:13   ` Shane Parslow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YzPkeEE0rbCurF4L@arch-x1c \
    --to=shaneparslow808@gmail.com \
    --cc=m.chetan.kumar@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.