From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<bjorn@kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
<jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <ast@kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] selftests/xsk: Add tests for XDP tail adjustment in AF_XDP
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 18:54:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z/VUvPIxGVJ5dRic@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321005419.684036-1-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 12:54:17AM +0000, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> This patch series adds tests to validate the XDP tail adjustment
> functionality, focusing on its use within the AF_XDP context. The tests
> verify dynamic packet size manipulation using the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail()
> helper function, covering both single and multi-buffer scenarios.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> 1. Retain and extend stream replacement: Keep `pkt_stream_replace`
> unchanged. Add `pkt_stream_replace_ifobject` for targeted ifobject
> handling.
>
> 2. Consolidate patches: Merge patches 2 to 6 for tail adjustment tests and
> check.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> 1. Introduce `adjust_value` to replace `count` for clearer communication
> with userspace.
>
> v3 -> v4:
> 1. Remove `testapp_adjust_tail_common()`. [Maciej]
>
> 2. Add comments and modify code for buffer resizing logic in test cases
> (shrink/grow by specific byte sizes for testing purposes). [Maciej]
Hi BPF maintainers,
could we merge this patch set as i have acked the patches? Or is there
something that stops us? I suppose this might have slipped during the
merge window?
Thanks,
Maciej
>
> ---
> Patch Summary:
>
> 1. Packet stream replacement: Add `pkt_stream_replace_ifobject` to manage
> packet streams efficiently.
>
> 2. Tail adjustment tests and support check: Implement dynamic packet
> resizing in xskxceiver by adding `xsk_xdp_adjust_tail` and extend this
> functionality to userspace with `testapp_xdp_adjust_tail` for
> validation. Ensure support by adding `is_adjust_tail_supported` to
> verify the availability of `bpf_xdp_adjust_tail()`. Introduce tests for
> shrinking and growing packets using `bpf_xdp_adjust_tail()`, covering
> both single and multi-buffer scenarios when used with AF_XDP.
> ---
>
> Tushar Vyavahare (2):
> selftests/xsk: Add packet stream replacement function
> selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment tests and support check
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
>
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c | 50 ++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_xdp_common.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++--
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 0:54 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] selftests/xsk: Add tests for XDP tail adjustment in AF_XDP Tushar Vyavahare
2025-03-21 0:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] selftests/xsk: Add packet stream replacement function Tushar Vyavahare
2025-03-22 13:02 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-21 0:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment tests and support check Tushar Vyavahare
2025-03-22 13:14 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-24 12:32 ` Bastien Curutchet
2025-04-08 16:54 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2025-04-09 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] selftests/xsk: Add tests for XDP tail adjustment in AF_XDP Alexei Starovoitov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-10 3:31 Tushar Vyavahare
2025-04-10 17:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-05-28 2:27 ` Vyavahare, Tushar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z/VUvPIxGVJ5dRic@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.