All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	sandipan.das@amd.com, babu.moger@amd.com, likexu@tencent.com,
	like.xu.linux@gmail.com, groug@kaod.org, khorenko@virtuozzo.com,
	alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com,
	davydov-max@yandex-team.ru, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
	dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, gaosong@loongson.cn,
	chenhuacai@kernel.org, philmd@linaro.org, aurelien@aurel32.net,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, arikalo@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	danielhb413@gmail.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	alistair.francis@wdc.com, liwei1518@gmail.com,
	zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	flavra@baylibre.com, ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com, ewanhai@zhaoxin.com,
	cobechen@zhaoxin.com, louisqi@zhaoxin.com, liamni@zhaoxin.com,
	frankzhu@zhaoxin.com, silviazhao@zhaoxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] target/i386/kvm: query kvm.enable_pmu parameter
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:05:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z/dRiyGTxb8JBE8v@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250331013307.11937-8-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>

Hi Dongli,

The logic is fine for me :-) And thank you to take my previous
suggestion. When I revisit here after these few weeks, I have some
thoughts:

> +        if (pmu_cap) {
> +            if ((pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE) &&
> +                !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
> +                ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
> +                                        KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
> +                if (ret < 0) {
> +                    error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> +                                     "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
> +                    return ret;
> +                }
> +            }

This case enhances vPMU disablement.

> +        } else {
> +            /*
> +             * KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is introduced in Linux v5.18. For old
> +             * linux, we have to check enable_pmu parameter for vPMU support.
> +             */
> +            g_autofree char *kvm_enable_pmu;
> +
> +            /*
> +             * The kvm.enable_pmu's permission is 0444. It does not change until
> +             * a reload of the KVM module.
> +             */
> +            if (g_file_get_contents("/sys/module/kvm/parameters/enable_pmu",
> +                                    &kvm_enable_pmu, NULL, NULL)) {
> +                if (*kvm_enable_pmu == 'N' && X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
> +                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable PMU since "
> +                               "KVM's enable_pmu parameter is disabled");
> +                    return -EPERM;
> +                }

And this case checks if vPMU could enable.

>              }
>          }
>      }

So I feel it's not good enough to check based on pmu_cap, we can
re-split it into these two cases: enable_pmu and !enable_pmu. Then we
can make the code path more clear!

Just like:

diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
index f68d5a057882..d728fb5eaec6 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -2041,44 +2041,42 @@ int kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
     if (first) {
         first = false;

-        /*
-         * Since Linux v5.18, KVM provides a VM-level capability to easily
-         * disable PMUs; however, QEMU has been providing PMU property per
-         * CPU since v1.6. In order to accommodate both, have to configure
-         * the VM-level capability here.
-         *
-         * KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE doesn't change the PMU
-         * behavior on Intel platform because current "pmu" property works
-         * as expected.
-         */
-        if (pmu_cap) {
-            if ((pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE) &&
-                !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
-                ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
-                                        KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
-                if (ret < 0) {
-                    error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
-                                     "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
-                    return ret;
-                }
-            }
-        } else {
-            /*
-             * KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is introduced in Linux v5.18. For old
-             * linux, we have to check enable_pmu parameter for vPMU support.
-             */
+        if (X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
             g_autofree char *kvm_enable_pmu;

             /*
-             * The kvm.enable_pmu's permission is 0444. It does not change until
-             * a reload of the KVM module.
+             * The enable_pmu parameter is introduced since Linux v5.17,
+             * give a chance to provide more information about vPMU
+             * enablement.
+             *
+             * The kvm.enable_pmu's permission is 0444. It does not change
+             * until a reload of the KVM module.
              */
             if (g_file_get_contents("/sys/module/kvm/parameters/enable_pmu",
                                     &kvm_enable_pmu, NULL, NULL)) {
-                if (*kvm_enable_pmu == 'N' && X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
-                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable PMU since "
+                if (*kvm_enable_pmu == 'N') {
+                    warn_report("Failed to enable PMU since "
                                "KVM's enable_pmu parameter is disabled");
-                    return -EPERM;
+                }
+            }
+        } else {
+            /*
+             * Since Linux v5.18, KVM provides a VM-level capability to easily
+             * disable PMUs; however, QEMU has been providing PMU property per
+             * CPU since v1.6. In order to accommodate both, have to configure
+             * the VM-level capability here.
+             *
+             * KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE doesn't change the PMU
+             * behavior on Intel platform because current "pmu" property works
+             * as expected.
+             */
+            if ((pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE)) {
+                ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
+                                        KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
+                if (ret < 0) {
+                    error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
+                                     "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
+                    return ret;
                 }
             }
         }




  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-31  1:32 [PATCH v3 00/10] target/i386/kvm/pmu: PMU Enhancement, Bugfix and Cleanup Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] target/i386: disable PerfMonV2 when PERFCORE unavailable Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] target/i386: disable PERFCORE when "-pmu" is configured Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] kvm: Introduce kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu() Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] target/i386/kvm: set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE if "-pmu" is configured Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] target/i386/kvm: extract unrelated code out of kvm_x86_build_cpuid() Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  2:41   ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] target/i386/kvm: rename architectural PMU variables Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] target/i386/kvm: query kvm.enable_pmu parameter Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  5:05   ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2025-04-10 20:16     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-04-16  7:48     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] target/i386/kvm: reset AMD PMU registers during VM reset Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  7:43   ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-10 21:17     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] target/i386/kvm: support perfmon-v2 for reset Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  8:21   ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-10 21:19     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] target/i386/kvm: don't stop Intel PMU counters Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  9:45   ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-10 22:25     ` Dongli Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z/dRiyGTxb8JBE8v@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=arikalo@gmail.com \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=cobechen@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=davydov-max@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=ewanhai@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=flavra@baylibre.com \
    --cc=frankzhu@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=gaosong@loongson.cn \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
    --cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liamni@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=likexu@tencent.com \
    --cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
    --cc=louisqi@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=silviazhao@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.