Re: Gerrit, GitButler, and Jujutsu projects collaborating on change-id commit footer

[Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>]

On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 08:47:37PM -0700, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> Yes, that's close to what we have in mind. I think I just didn't
> explain clearly that it's mostly harmless in at least Jujutsu if there
> are multiple commits with the same change id. If there are multiple
> visible commits with the same change id, then you'll just have to
> decide what should happen when the user tries to refer to commits by
> change id. We currently let it resolve to all the visible commits with
> the given change id. We may change that to be an error instead [1].
> The user can always fall back to using the commit id in such cases. We
> call change ids with multiple visible commits "divergent". They
> currently show up in red in `jj log`, which I think we all agree makes
> them seem unnecessarily scary. We'll probably change that soon [2]
> [3].

To support search by change ID you can use refs named something like
refs/change-IDs/<change-ID>, and the ref can either point to a singular
commit if the change ID is intended to be unique, or it can point to a
root commit which lists the commits with that change ID.

> So when I said that I think it's quite uncommon to have multiple
> commits with the same change id, I didn't mean that as an excuse to
> not consider the other cases at all. I just mean that I think the vast
> majority of commits are not cherry-picked, so we don't need to
> optimize the user experience for that case - it's fine if it's a bit
> more complicated to refer to such commits.

Fair.

Nico
--