From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ublk: improve handling of saturated queues when ublk server exits
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:56:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z+RN+CPnWO69aJD5@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z+Q/SNmX+DpVQ5ir@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:54:16AM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> > ublk_abort_requests() should be called only in case of queue dying,
> > since ublk server may open & close the char device multiple times.
>
> Sure that is technically possible, however is any real ublk server doing
> this? Seems like a strange thing to do, and seems reasonable for the
> driver to transition the device to the nosrv state (dead or recovery,
> depending on flags) when the char device is closed, since in this case,
> no one can be handling I/O anymore.
I see ublksrv itself is doing this :(
/* Wait until ublk device is setup by udev */
static void ublksrv_check_dev(const struct ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info *info)
{
unsigned int max_time = 1000000, wait = 0;
char buf[64];
snprintf(buf, 64, "%s%d", "/dev/ublkc", info->dev_id);
while (wait < max_time) {
int fd = open(buf, O_RDWR);
if (fd > 0) {
close(fd);
break;
}
usleep(100000);
wait += 100000;
}
}
This seems related to some failures in ublksrv tests
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-25 22:19 [PATCH 0/4] ublk: improve handling of saturated queues when ublk server exits Uday Shankar
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ublk: kublk: use ioctl-encoded opcodes Uday Shankar
2025-03-25 22:26 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 3:07 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests: ublk: kublk: fix an error log line Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 3:08 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests: ublk: kublk: ignore SIGCHLD Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 3:23 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-26 17:17 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-25 22:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] ublk: improve handling of saturated queues when ublk server exits Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 5:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-26 17:54 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-26 18:56 ` Uday Shankar [this message]
2025-03-26 23:08 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-27 1:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-27 1:23 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-31 23:17 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-02 3:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-02 19:41 ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-27 2:06 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z+RN+CPnWO69aJD5@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com \
--to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.