From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeouts B and C
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 11:10:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z--T5LEsXddkTX-H@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z--PgeuYjRx6zXmG@kitsune.suse.cz>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 09:51:29AM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:43:19PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:45:21PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 06:45:40PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > > > With some Infineon chips the timeouts in tpm_tis_send_data (both B and
> > > > > C) can reach up to about 2250 ms.
> > > > >
> > > > > Extend the timeout duration to accommodate this.
> > > >
> > > > The problem here is the bump of timeout_c is going to interact poorly with
> > > > the Infineon errata workaround, as now we'll wait 4s instead of 200ms to
> > > > detect the stuck status change.
> > > >
> > > > (Also shouldn't timeout_c already end up as 750ms, as it's
> > > > max(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT, TPM2_TIMEOUT_C), and TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT is 750 vs 200
> > > > for TPM2_TIMEOUT_C? That doesn't seem to be borne out by your logs, nor my
> > > > results.)
> > >
> > > Just noticed that the commit did not end up having fixes etc. tags:
> > >
> > > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/commit/?id=de9e33df7762abbfc2a1568291f2c3a3154c6a9d
> > >
> > > Should we forward to stable?
> >
> > It's a TPM bug rather than a kernel issue, so I don't think there's a valid
> > Fixes: for it, but it's certainly stable material in my mind.
>
> In the more general sense of Fixes: indicating where the fix is
> applicable it would be any kernel that supports TPM2.
I tried applying the patch on 6.1-stable:
~/work/kernel.org/stable/linux tags/v6.1.132
$ git am -3 ~/Downloads/infineon.patch
Applying: tpm, tpm_tis: Workaround failed command reception on Infineon devices
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
M drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
M include/linux/tpm.h
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging include/linux/tpm.h
Auto-merging drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
Auto-merging drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
If no counter-opinions, I'd add:
stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.1+
I based this on Bookworm kernel.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michal
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 17:21 [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeouts B and C Michal Suchanek
2025-04-02 17:45 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-02 20:07 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 9:31 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 11:00 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-03 11:56 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 13:00 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-03 14:11 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 18:25 ` [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeout B Michal Suchanek
2025-04-03 18:28 ` Paul Menzel
2025-04-04 8:23 ` [PATCH v3] tpm: tis: Double the timeout B to 4s Michal Suchanek
2025-04-04 8:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-05-14 12:10 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-05-15 1:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-05-15 11:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-03 18:49 ` [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeout B Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-04 7:53 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-04 8:12 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-04 8:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-03 18:45 ` [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeouts B and C Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-03 20:43 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-04 7:51 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-04 8:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-04-04 9:31 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-04 11:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-03 18:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z--T5LEsXddkTX-H@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=noodles@earth.li \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.