All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
	horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: hold netdev reference during qdisc_create request_module
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:22:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-HbGR1V9-1Fwf0H@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324150425.32b3ec10@kernel.org>

On 03/24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:51:03 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >  			rtnl_lock();
> >  			netdev_lock_ops(dev);
> > +			dev_put(dev);
> >  			ops = qdisc_lookup_ops(kind);
> 
> I'm not sure if this is a correct sequence. Do we guarantee that locks
> will be taken before device is freed? I mean we do:
> 
> 	dev = netdev_wait_allrefs_any()
> 	free_netdev(dev)
> 		mutex_destroy(dev->lock)
> 
> without explicitly taking rtnl_lock() or netdev_lock(), so the moment
> that dev_put() is called the device may get freed from another thread
> - while its locked here.
> 
> My mental model is that taking the instance lock on a dev for which we
> only have a ref requires a dance implemented in __netdev_put_lock().

Good point, didn't think about it. In this case, I think I need to
get back to exposing locked/unlocked signal back to the callers.
Even with __netdev_put_lock, there is a case where the netdev is
dead and can't be relocked. Will add some new 'bool *locked' argument
and reset it here; the caller will skip unlock when 'locked == false'.
LMK if you have better ideas, otherwise will post something tomorrow.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-24 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-20 16:51 [PATCH net-next v2] net: hold netdev reference during qdisc_create request_module Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-24 22:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:22   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-03-25 10:28     ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-HbGR1V9-1Fwf0H@mini-arch \
    --to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.