From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:52:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-V0NMf-ym2FKUr1@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327154910.GB21843@breakpoint.cc>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > Don't rely on a successful evaluation of set->key.
> > > > With this input, set->key fails validation but subsequent
> > > > element evaluation asserts because the context points at
> > > > the set key -- an empty concatenation.
> > > >
> > > > Causes:
> > > > nft: src/evaluate.c:1681: expr_evaluate_concat: Assertion `!list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions)' failed.
> > > >
> > > > After patch:
> > > > internal:0:0-0: Error: unqualified type specified in set definition. Try "typeof expression" instead of "type datatype".
> > > > internal:0:0-0: Error: Could not parse symbolic invalid expression
> > >
> > > Maybe block this from the json parser itself?
> >
> > Maybe this instead? This covers for empty concatenation in both set
> > key and set data.
>
> I don't like the idea of having to keep double-error-checks in
> both json and bison frontends.
>
> I would prefer a generic solution where possible, unless
> there is some other advantage such as better error reporting.
I have been trying to trigger this from the bison parser, but I could
not.
I think assertion are still useful to denote something is very broken
if we get to the evaluation step with an empty concatenation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-27 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 11:52 [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation Florian Westphal
2025-03-27 15:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:49 ` Florian Westphal
2025-03-27 15:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2025-03-27 15:55 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-V0NMf-ym2FKUr1@calendula \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.