From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: LiamNioc <LiamNi-oc@zhaoxin.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, LiamNi@zhaoxin.com, CobeChen@zhaoxin.com,
LouisQi@zhaoxin.com, EwanHai@zhaoxin.com, FrankZhu@zhaoxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86:Cancel hrtimer in the process of saving PIT state to reduce the performance overhead caused by hrtimer during guest stop.
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 07:48:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-_xNpgsYDW0_4Jn@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <676ed22f-9c3f-4013-99d8-37c4c73bb9ac@zhaoxin.com>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025, LiamNioc wrote:
> On 2025/3/17 21:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, Liam Ni wrote:
> > > When using the dump-guest-memory command in QEMU to dump
> > > the virtual machine's memory,the virtual machine will be
> > > paused for a period of time.If the guest (i.e., UEFI) uses
> > > the PIT as the system clock,it will be observed that the
> > > HRTIMER used by the PIT continues to run during the guest
> > > stop process, imposing an additional burden on the system.
> > > Moreover, during the guest restart process,the previously
> > > established HRTIMER will be canceled,and the accumulated
> > > timer events will be flushed.However, before the old
> > > HRTIMER is canceled,the accumulated timer events
> > > will "surreptitiously" inject interrupts into the guest.
> > >
> > > SO during the process of saving the KVM PIT state,
> > > the HRTIMER need to be canceled to reduce the performance overhead
> > > caused by HRTIMER during the guest stop process.
> > >
> > > i.e. if guest
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Liam Ni <liamni-oc@zhaoxin.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > index 045c61cc7e54..75355b315aca 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > @@ -6405,6 +6405,8 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_pit(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pit_state *ps)
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&kps->lock);
> > > memcpy(ps, &kps->channels, sizeof(*ps));
> > > + hrtimer_cancel(&kvm->arch.vpit->pit_state.timer);
> > > + kthread_flush_work(&kvm->arch.vpit->expired);
> >
> > KVM cannot assume userspace wants to stop the PIT when grabbing a snapshot. It's
> > a significant ABI change, and not desirable in all cases.
>
> When VM Pause, all devices of the virtual machine are frozen, so the PIT
> freeze only saves the PIT device status, but does not cancel HRTIMER, but
> chooses to cancel HRTIMER when VM resumes and refresh the pending task.
> According to my observation, before refreshing the pending task, these
> pending tasks will secretly inject interrupts into the guest.
>
> So do we need to cancel the HRTIMER when VM pause?
The problem is that KVM has no real concept of pausing a VM. There are a variety
of hacky hooks here and there, but no KVM-wide notion of "pause".
For this case, after getting PIT state, you should be able to use KVM_SET_PIT2 to
set the mode of channel[0] to 0xff, which call destroy_pit_timer() via
pit_load_count().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 9:19 [PATCH] KVM: x86:Cancel hrtimer in the process of saving PIT state to reduce the performance overhead caused by hrtimer during guest stop Liam Ni
2025-03-17 13:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-25 6:10 ` LiamNioc
2025-04-04 14:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-04-07 2:19 ` LiamNioc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-_xNpgsYDW0_4Jn@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=CobeChen@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=EwanHai@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=FrankZhu@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=LiamNi-oc@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=LiamNi@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=LouisQi@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.