Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] net: modernize ioremap in probe

["Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 02:27:50PM -0800, Rosen Penev wrote:
> resource aquisition and ioremap can be performed in one step.
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> index 571631a30320..af9291574931 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> @@ -7425,21 +7425,16 @@ static int mvpp2_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mvpp2 *priv)
>  static int mvpp2_get_sram(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  			  struct mvpp2 *priv)
>  {
> -	struct resource *res;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  
> -	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
> -	if (!res) {
> +	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 2);
> +	if (IS_ERR(base)) {
>  		if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev))
>  			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "ACPI is too old, Flow control not supported\n");
>  		else
>  			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DT is too old, Flow control not supported\n");
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(base);
> +	}

This is not equivalent. This means if ioremap() fails inside
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), we end up printing a message that
blames the firmware, which is wrong.

It also changes a "resource missing, proceed anyway" situation into
a failure situation.

Please drop this change, "cleaning" this up is introducing bugs.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!