Re: [PATCH-for-9.2? v2 1/2] tests/functional/test_version: Use QTest accelerator

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 3/12/24 10:18, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:10:35AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > When testing with a HVF-only binary, we get:
> > > 
> > >     3/12 qemu:func-quick+func-aarch64 / func-aarch64-version                                      ERROR            0.29s   exit status 1
> > >    stderr:
> > >    Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >      File "tests/functional/test_version.py", line 22, in test_qmp_human_info_version
> > >        self.vm.launch()
> > >      File "machine/machine.py", line 461, in launch
> > >        raise VMLaunchFailure(
> > >    qemu.machine.machine.VMLaunchFailure: ConnectError: Failed to establish session: EOFError
> > >        Exit code: 1
> > >        Command: build/qemu-system-aarch64 -display none -vga none -chardev socket,id=mon,fd=5 -mon chardev=mon,mode=control -machine none -nodefaults
> > >        Output: qemu-system-aarch64: No accelerator selected and no default accelerator available
> > > 
> > > Explicit the QTest accelerator to be able to run the HMP command.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >   tests/functional/test_version.py | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/functional/test_version.py b/tests/functional/test_version.py
> > > index 3ab3b67f7e3..d3da796991f 100755
> > > --- a/tests/functional/test_version.py
> > > +++ b/tests/functional/test_version.py
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ class Version(QemuSystemTest):
> > >       def test_qmp_human_info_version(self):
> > >           self.set_machine('none')
> > > +        self.vm.add_args('-accel', 'qtest')
> > 
> > IMHO this is wrong. The functional tests are there to test the
> > real functional behaviour under an actual accelerator not qtest.
> 
> It works using '-accel hvf'. The issue is:
> 
>   "No accelerator selected and no default accelerator available"
> 
> So we should select HVF over QTest by default? I tend to not
> enforce any default because we always get troubles with them,
> what is today's default is unlikely tomorrow's one.

I don't know the history of HVF, but why would we ever not
want to pick HVF if that is the /only/ accelerator built
in to the binary ? Surely the build configuration chosen
inherantly says we want HVF used all the time.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|