From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>,
Larry D'Anna <larry@elder-gods.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] t5548: new test cases for push --porcelain and --dry-run
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:26:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0Q0sSsUXg47gn6Y@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7cedfd718c4f2d6fed7420a3341e82c9287d2085.1731603991.git.zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 01:15:32AM +0800, Jiang Xin wrote:
> From: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
>
> Refactor t5548 and add new test cases for git-push with both --porcelain
> and --dry-run flags in order to cover the issues reported by Patrick.
>
> When executing git-push(1) with the "--porcelain" flag, then we will
> print updated references in a machine-readable format that looks like
> this:
>
> To destination
> = refs/heads/noop:refs/heads/noop [up to date]
> ! refs/heads/rejected:refs/heads/rejected [rejected] (atomic push failed)
> ! refs/heads/noff:refs/heads/(off (non-fast-forward)
> Done
>
> The final "Done" stanza was introduced via 77555854be (git-push: make
> git push --porcelain print "Done", 2010-02-26), where it was printed
> "unless any errors have occurred". For the purpose of the "Done" line,
> knowing a ref will be rejected in a --dry-run does not count as an
> error. Actual rejections in non --dry-run pushes do count as errors.
>
> The new test cases will be used in the next commit to protect the above
> behaviors of porcelain output of git push.
It's a bit hard to make sense of this commit: does it introduce new
tests? Does it refactor existing tests? Does it change the test setup?
It seems to be a mixture of all of these, which makes it hard to see
what the actual change is.
I'd propose to split up this commit into multiple ones: one that
introduces `restore_upstream()`, one that adapts the test data, and one
that introduces new tests.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 11:24 [PATCH 0/2] transport: don't ignore git-receive-pack(1) exit code on atomic push Patrick Steinhardt
2024-11-13 11:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] t5504: modernize test by moving heredocs into test bodies Patrick Steinhardt
2024-11-13 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] transport: don't ignore git-receive-pack(1) exit code on atomic push Patrick Steinhardt
2024-11-14 8:57 ` Jiang Xin
2024-11-14 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] fix behaviors of git-push --porcelain Jiang Xin
2024-11-14 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] t5548: new test cases for push --porcelain and --dry-run Jiang Xin
2024-11-25 8:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-12-03 11:52 ` Jiang Xin
2024-11-14 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] push: fix the behavior of the Done message for porcelain Jiang Xin
2024-11-25 8:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-11-14 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] t5504: modernize test by moving heredocs into test bodies Jiang Xin
2024-11-14 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] t5543: atomic push reports exit code failure Jiang Xin
2024-11-14 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] push: only ignore finish_connect() for dry-run mode Jiang Xin
2024-11-25 8:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-11-14 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] push: not send push-options to server with --dry-run Jiang Xin
2024-11-25 8:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] fix behaviors of git-push --porcelain Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] t5504: modernize test by moving heredocs into test bodies Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] t5548: refactor to reuse setup_upstream() function Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] t5548: refactor test cases by resetting upstream Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] t5548: add new porcelain test cases Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] t5548: add porcelain push test cases for dry-run mode Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 12:19 ` Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] send-pack: new return code "ERROR_SEND_PACK_BAD_REF_STATUS" Jiang Xin
2024-12-16 8:36 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] t5543: atomic push reports exit code failure Jiang Xin
2024-12-10 11:36 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] send-pack: gracefully close the connection for atomic push Jiang Xin
2024-12-16 8:36 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-11-14 23:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] transport: don't ignore git-receive-pack(1) exit code on " Junio C Hamano
2024-11-25 8:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] t5504: modernize test by moving heredocs into test bodies Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 14:28 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-01-31 16:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-03 6:04 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] t5548: refactor to reuse setup_upstream() function Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 14:35 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] t5548: refactor test cases by resetting upstream Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] t5548: add new porcelain test cases Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 14:46 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] t5548: add porcelain push test cases for dry-run mode Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] send-pack: new return code "ERROR_SEND_PACK_BAD_REF_STATUS" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] t5543: atomic push reports exit code failure Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-31 10:53 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] send-pack: gracefully close the connection for atomic push Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] transport: don't ignore git-receive-pack(1) exit code on " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] t5504: modernize test by moving heredocs into test bodies Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] t5548: refactor to reuse setup_upstream() function Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] t5548: refactor test cases by resetting upstream Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] t5548: add new porcelain test cases Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] t5548: add porcelain push test cases for dry-run mode Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] send-pack: new return code "ERROR_SEND_PACK_BAD_REF_STATUS" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] t5543: atomic push reports exit code failure Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] send-pack: gracefully close the connection for atomic push Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-03 23:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] transport: don't ignore git-receive-pack(1) exit code on " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0Q0sSsUXg47gn6Y@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=larry@elder-gods.org \
--cc=worldhello.net@gmail.com \
--cc=zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.