From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
yury.norov@gmail.com, linux@weissschuh.net, gjoyce@ibm.com,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: work around false-postive stringop-overread errors
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 11:38:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1Cvs1xNSDQRJ1Ri@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112124127.1666300-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Nilay,
I see you didn't CC the maintainers for this file. You might consider
looking through:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
And:
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f kernel/padata.c
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> (maintainer:PADATA PARALLEL EXECUTION MECHANISM)
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> (maintainer:PADATA PARALLEL EXECUTION MECHANISM)
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org (open list:PADATA PARALLEL EXECUTION MECHANISM)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:PADATA PARALLEL EXECUTION MECHANISM)
I'll leave the full contents intact below for their sake, with a few
inline comments as well:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 06:11:24PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> While building the powerpc code using gcc 13, I came across following
> errors generated for kernel/padata.c file:
>
> CC kernel/padata.o
> In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:390,
> from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:16,
> from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/current.h:13,
> from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:23,
> from ./include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
> from ./arch/powerpc/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
> from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79,
> from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
> from ./include/linux/swait.h:7,
> from ./include/linux/completion.h:12,
> from kernel/padata.c:14:
> In function ‘bitmap_copy’,
> inlined from ‘cpumask_copy’ at ./include/linux/cpumask.h:839:2,
> inlined from ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’ at kernel/padata.c:730:2:
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:114:33: error: ‘__builtin_memcpy’ reading between 257 and 536870904 bytes from a region of size 256 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
> 114 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> | ^
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:633:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__underlying_memcpy’
> 633 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:678:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘__fortify_memcpy_chk’
> 678 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/bitmap.h:259:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘memcpy’
> 259 | memcpy(dst, src, len);
> | ^~~~~~
> kernel/padata.c: In function ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’:
> kernel/padata.c:713:48: note: source object ‘pcpumask’ of size [0, 256]
> 713 | cpumask_var_t pcpumask,
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
> In function ‘bitmap_copy’,
> inlined from ‘cpumask_copy’ at ./include/linux/cpumask.h:839:2,
> inlined from ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’ at kernel/padata.c:730:2:
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:114:33: error: ‘__builtin_memcpy’ reading between 257 and 536870904 bytes from a region of size 256 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
> 114 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> | ^
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:633:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__underlying_memcpy’
> 633 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:678:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘__fortify_memcpy_chk’
> 678 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/bitmap.h:259:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘memcpy’
> 259 | memcpy(dst, src, len);
> | ^~~~~~
> kernel/padata.c: In function ‘__padata_set_cpumasks’:
> kernel/padata.c:713:48: note: source object ‘pcpumask’ of size [0, 256]
> 713 | cpumask_var_t pcpumask,
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~
>
> Apparentrly, above errors only menifests with GCC 13.x and config option
> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. Furthermore, if I use gcc 11.x or gcc 12.x then I
> don't encounter above errors. Prima facie, these erros appear to be false-
> positive. Brian informed me that currently some efforts are underway by
> GCC developers to emit more verbose information when GCC detects string
> overflow errors and that might help to further narrow down the root cause
> of this error. So for now, silence these errors using -Wno-stringop-
> overread gcc option while building kernel/padata.c file until we find the
> root cause.
You might consider running this paragraph through a spelling checker if you submit a
v2.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7cbbd751-8332-4ab2-afa7-8c353834772a@linux.ibm.com/
> Cc: briannorris@chromium.org
> Cc: kees@kernel.org
> Cc: nathan@kernel.org
> Cc: yury.norov@gmail.com
> Cc: linux@weissschuh.net
> Cc: gjoyce@ibm.com
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
> index 87866b037fbe..e5adba7a30f1 100644
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG) += cfi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += events/
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_USER_RETURN_NOTIFIER) += user-return-notifier.o
> +CFLAGS_padata.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, stringop-overread)
Personally, I'd recommend a comment here, noting that these warnings
seem to produce false positives on GCC 13+. But otherwise, this seems OK
to me:
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> obj-$(CONFIG_PADATA) += padata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) += jump_label.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING) += context_tracking.o
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 12:41 [PATCH] cpumask: work around false-postive stringop-overread errors Nilay Shroff
2024-12-04 19:38 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2024-12-05 12:05 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1Cvs1xNSDQRJ1Ri@google.com \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.