From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C174E77173 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 11:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08E13E6CC6 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 12:43:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671F13E6CA2 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 12:43:21 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-6.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A418D1416734 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 12:43:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F61B21134; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 11:43:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733485399; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2D5D0Ubem88SoqI3SzQLlWn8sDBsaY8Y82SSigsCjbM=; b=RVO44OcbsvropwKmOhBDGpnOAfNGxcLAZHaPBbq1Zrwso3lByjhQCOcpRqdkjKanQikblN ld4YvXt2JZPxzBWBu3+eTA7RuiExmZrpl5qRjf2uKnsLa37/AC6hpDsYGOWBwkUzCFXef6 9UZCV8JGebq29b5FrWNRuwg6OXuYtDA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733485399; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2D5D0Ubem88SoqI3SzQLlWn8sDBsaY8Y82SSigsCjbM=; b=Whw90RIpvuBemFxv4vm7GfqK9dGQJAIBx0PZrdWSctQOUk1QgVJQqE9SGsrieYgmcw9lDz 18gF8TDw+lah5gCw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=RVO44Ocb; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Whw90RIp DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1733485399; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2D5D0Ubem88SoqI3SzQLlWn8sDBsaY8Y82SSigsCjbM=; b=RVO44OcbsvropwKmOhBDGpnOAfNGxcLAZHaPBbq1Zrwso3lByjhQCOcpRqdkjKanQikblN ld4YvXt2JZPxzBWBu3+eTA7RuiExmZrpl5qRjf2uKnsLa37/AC6hpDsYGOWBwkUzCFXef6 9UZCV8JGebq29b5FrWNRuwg6OXuYtDA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1733485399; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2D5D0Ubem88SoqI3SzQLlWn8sDBsaY8Y82SSigsCjbM=; b=Whw90RIpvuBemFxv4vm7GfqK9dGQJAIBx0PZrdWSctQOUk1QgVJQqE9SGsrieYgmcw9lDz 18gF8TDw+lah5gCw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1F213647; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 11:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id iiawAlfjUmfYNQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 06 Dec 2024 11:43:19 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 12:43:35 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: References: <20241129133421.24349-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241129133421.24349-1-mdoucha@suse.cz> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1F61B21134 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25478, ipnet:::/0, country:RU]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add test for data integrity over NFS X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Add NFS test which checks data integrity of random writes into a file, > with both buffered and direct I/O. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Doucha > --- > > Changes since v1: Added TST_TIMEOUT > > The lower loop count is necessary because NFS has very large block size, > up to 256KB on x86_64. The new tests take ~50 minutes to complete in total > on my laptop. With the default loop count, the TCP tests would all time out. > > The subtest timeout is fully determined by NFS block size and hardcoded > command line arguments. For TCP tests, it's exactly 8 minutes 32 seconds > so the whole test script will take no more than 34 minutes 8 seconds. > The TST_TIMEOUT value is rounded up to 40 minutes to add some margin > for setup and cleanup. This is only on a one particular setup though. I bet it would be a few hours on a hardware with slower I/O. What about we change the fsplough so that it loops over tst_remaining_runtime() and pass a runtime instead of number of iterations? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp