All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
	xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, frank.li@nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 5/5] net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 17:09:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1W2lp5jNPqJZi4C@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241204052932.112446-6-wei.fang@nxp.com>

On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 01:29:32PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> Set NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 bit of hw_features and features because i.MX95
> enetc and LS1028A driver implements UDP segmentation.
> 
> - i.MX95 ENETC supports UDP segmentation via LSO.
> - LS1028A ENETC supports UDP segmentation since the commit 3d5b459ba0e3
> ("net: tso: add UDP segmentation support").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2: rephrase the commit message
> v3: no changes
> v4: fix typo in commit message
> v5: no changes
> v6: no changes
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 6 ++++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c        | 6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> index 82a67356abe4..76fc3c6fdec1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> @@ -110,11 +110,13 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
>  	ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
>  			    NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
>  			    NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK |
> -			    NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> +			    NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> +			    NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
>  	ndev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
>  			 NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
>  			 NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> -			 NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> +			 NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> +			 NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
>  	ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
>  			      NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;

I didn't see any wording about it in the commit message / cover letter
so I will ask: Any reason not to enable UDP segmentation offload on
upper VLAN devices by setting the feature in 'ndev->vlan_features'?

>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> index 63d78b2b8670..3768752b6008 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> @@ -145,11 +145,13 @@ static void enetc_vf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
>  	ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
>  			    NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
>  			    NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> -			    NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> +			    NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> +			    NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
>  	ndev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
>  			 NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
>  			 NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> -			 NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> +			 NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> +			 NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
>  	ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
>  			      NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-08 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-04  5:29 [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 0/5] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1 Wei Fang
2024-12-04  5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 1/5] net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC Wei Fang
2024-12-06  9:23   ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 10:33     ` Wei Fang
2024-12-06 12:30       ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 12:45         ` Wei Fang
2024-12-08 15:47           ` Ido Schimmel
2024-12-10  7:49             ` Wei Fang
2024-12-10 20:07               ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04  5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 2/5] net: enetc: add Tx " Wei Fang
2024-12-06  9:37   ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 10:46     ` Wei Fang
2024-12-06 12:32       ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 12:38         ` Wei Fang
2024-12-06 13:31           ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04  5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 3/5] net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number " Wei Fang
2024-12-06 10:11   ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04  5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 4/5] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-12-06  9:59   ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 10:33     ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04  5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 5/5] net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support Wei Fang
2024-12-08 15:09   ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-12-08 15:54     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z1W2lp5jNPqJZi4C@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.