Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] s390x/cpumodel: add msa12 changes

[Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>]

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 04:45:25PM +0100, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 12/9/24 4:24 PM, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:48:11PM +0100, Janosch Frank wrote:
> > > On 12/6/24 1:27 PM, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> > > > MSA12 changes the KIMD/KLMD instruction format for SHA3/SHAKE.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > MSA6 is a prereq, no?
> > 
> > MSA6 is the prereq. However, there is no explicit feature definition
> > for the MSA_EXT_6 due to no STFLE and subfunctions only.  The only
> > way would be to pick one or more / all MSA6 subfunctions for which
> > there is a feature defined...
> 
> Which you did for MSA11, no?

The other way around.

Here: MSA_EXT_12 would check/have a dependency on all(?) subfuncs
introduced with MSA_EXT_6.

> 
> I'm not saying that subfunc handling is great :)

Let me have a look which functions come with MSA_6 related to KIMD/KLMD.

Would it be OK to have those checks as a separate patch so that cpu
model in general is not blocked?