From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE882451C6; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733869840; cv=none; b=KYDps4BdcRP+jaXSErbgAKctcQfInxmRZQq9/Wvt2ZgiK/wOvc/OfwWHbm4HVmFvddCCLY0OS3ZVlIlvCu3Nq729ms2+LABzMsiz2jLDq1kk1DMAH+mpfGsVd+qetAkbGfKCRsoAt6Ef0Yjh5WYtHF+YH/beEkr4ghpliD/UsTA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733869840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9+51JCB/pG5QGsHxuMElgRDWlaGSIllUoxznJzKEcbw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t/abxeKj+kgSNLJwNJzp7Svl3ZdtVf60rtGu3kOPuIaTmFipCAlMvIBxe6HKavHAAW5Ivn/zF9Nvpk8ZPVOAElBrc29+3m12fweDi+19J1H6ysn6cll+aztU2G0a86uFJ49YM1vHbCXbBldjQo4PbVTQpzKrX1R1bJ47cPDNbIo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aIF4hkjj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aIF4hkjj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 385B3C4CED6; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:30:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733869839; bh=9+51JCB/pG5QGsHxuMElgRDWlaGSIllUoxznJzKEcbw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aIF4hkjjuZNfR+HmsFgPDxY2qk6pMNQ18HA7+QYsxNBOS5wbEdkgZFFdvWNaCqAuz 9rxGOqyWjEGF53PuTnlOfPj1H1Y/qD1Cbe7TrwTZPh3wxxiCI6E8O74x3cXfEL40We nO6yh7MGvidEQpVIeYv2GAK+I6yYLhw7PSvWY1kWL0+O+hDCXh2nYX8+AbdYnn1iOX A4dgbY78T+ZJr5X7jsSNt/HX0/AF7XWoLLF6JelqXmH2/PJpx2CQb1pa+DM4w8O8bF Sr/2GlhcJEAD/PgLbQr8OrP23Awwh6Hx/GTPfuMiqw8F6i3gStutSBCMlGIrG4hlVM ekbcMAQljUTWw== Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:30:36 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: Howard Chu Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf trace: Add tests for BTF general augmentation Message-ID: References: <20241126223257.22465-1-howardchu95@gmail.com> <20241126223257.22465-2-howardchu95@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241126223257.22465-2-howardchu95@gmail.com> Hello, On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:32:56PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote: > Currently, we only have perf trace augmentation tests for enum > arguments. This patch adds tests for more general syscall arguments, > such as struct pointers, strings, and buffers. > > These tests utilize the perf config system to configure the perf trace > output, as suggested by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Suggested-by: Ian Rogers > Signed-off-by: Howard Chu > --- > tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh > > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000000..903310b355c4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_btf_general.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ > +#!/bin/bash > +# perf trace BTF general tests > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +err=0 > +set -e > + > +. "$(dirname $0)"/lib/probe.sh > +skip_if_no_perf_trace || exit 2 The kernel might not have BPF/BTF support. I think you can check if /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux is there and skip the test if not. Thanks, Namhyung > + > +file1=$(mktemp /tmp/file1_XXXXX) > +file2=$(echo $file1 | sed 's/file1/file2/g') > + > +buffer="buffer content" > +perf_config_tmp=$(mktemp /tmp/.perfconfig_XXXXX) > + > +trap cleanup EXIT TERM INT HUP > + > +trace_test_string() { > + echo "Testing perf trace's string augmentation" > + if ! perf trace -e renameat* --max-events=1 -- mv ${file1} ${file2} 2>&1 | \ > + grep -q -E "^mv/[0-9]+ renameat(2)?\(.*, \"${file1}\", .*, \"${file2}\", .*\) += +[0-9]+$" > + then > + echo "String augmentation test failed" > + err=1 > + fi > +} > + > +trace_test_buffer() { > + echo "Testing perf trace's buffer augmentation" > + # echo will insert a newline (\10) at the end of the buffer > + if ! perf trace -e write --max-events=1 -- echo "${buffer}" 2>&1 | \ > + grep -q -E "^echo/[0-9]+ write\([0-9]+, ${buffer}.*, [0-9]+\) += +[0-9]+$" > + then > + echo "Buffer augmentation test failed" > + err=1 > + fi > +} > + > +trace_test_struct_btf() { > + echo "Testing perf trace's struct augmentation" > + if ! perf trace -e clock_nanosleep --force-btf --max-events=1 -- sleep 1 2>&1 | \ > + grep -q -E "^sleep/[0-9]+ clock_nanosleep\(0, 0, \{1,\}, 0x[0-9a-f]+\) += +[0-9]+$" > + then > + echo "BTF struct augmentation test failed" > + err=1 > + fi > +} > + > +cleanup() { > + rm -rf ${file1} ${file2} ${perf_config_tmp} > +} > + > +trap_cleanup() { > + echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}" > + cleanup > + exit 1 > +} > + > +# don't overwrite user's perf config > +trace_config() { > + export PERF_CONFIG=${perf_config_tmp} > + perf config trace.show_arg_names=false trace.show_duration=false \ > + trace.show_timestamp=false trace.args_alignment=0 > +} > + > +trace_config > + > +trace_test_string > + > +if [ $err = 0 ]; then > + trace_test_buffer > +fi > + > +if [ $err = 0 ]; then > + trace_test_struct_btf > +fi > + > +cleanup > + > +exit $err > -- > 2.43.0 >