From: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>
To: Magnus Lindholm <linmag7@gmail.com>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
paulmck@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Oops on alpha with kernel version >=6.9.x
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:10:18 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2ClSlwznfuk8Uwr@creeky> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+=Fv5Q=f-6y=EhZhG2XfZB0O=m+yOiv+gmtmMABVQZieKdwbQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:05:46AM +0100, Magnus Lindholm wrote:
> > Maybe, maybe not. Building 6.11.11 with alpha-linux-gnu-gcc-9
> > (Debian 9.3.0-22) fixed the null pointer access in the scsi
> > subsystem, and finally I have a bootable system! (Tested on ES45.)
> > But I now get a null pointer access when network driver loaded:
>
> Very interesting! Can you provide a full stack dump? interested to
> see if this is the same issue as on my system.
[ 33.144514] e100 0001:02:04.0 enP1p2s4: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
[ 36.878887] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000
[ 36.879863] CPU 0
[ 36.879863] kworker/0:1(10): Oops -1
[ 36.881817] pc = [<0000000000000000>] ra = [<0000000000000001>] ps = 0000 Not tainted
[ 36.882793] pc is at 0x0
[ 36.883770] ra is at 0x1
[ 36.884746] v0 = 0000000000000007 t0 = 0000000000000001 t1 = fffffc000091cc80
[ 36.884746] t2 = 0000000000000000 t3 = fffffc00040cca40 t4 = 0000000000000001
[ 36.884746] t5 = 0000000000000001 t6 = 0000000000000000 t7 = fffffc0004124000
[ 36.884746] s0 = fffffc000a037e00 s1 = fffffc000a037f28 s2 = fffffffffffffed8
[ 36.884746] s3 = fffffc0004020b40 s4 = fffffc0001c8d688 s5 = fffffc0004020bc0
[ 36.884746] s6 = fffffc0001c8d680
[ 36.884746] a0 = fffffc0001c5b320 a1 = fffffc000ac14200 a2 = fffffc00040ccac0
[ 36.884746] a3 = fffffc0003df36c0 a4 = fffffc000dfb3d38 a5 = ffffffffffffffff
[ 36.884746] t8 = 0000000000000000 t9 = 0000000000000000 t10= 0000000000000001
[ 36.884746] t11= 0000000000000001 pv = fffffc00018b7180 at = 0000000000000001
[ 36.884746] gp = fffffc0001cb08c8 sp = 00000000ab1ca88d
[ 36.884746] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[ 36.896465] Trace:
[ 36.896465] [<fffffc0001049c8c>] process_scheduled_works+0xdc/0x420
[ 36.898418] [<fffffc000104a740>] worker_thread+0x0/0x3d0
[ 36.899395] [<fffffc000104a8f0>] worker_thread+0x1b0/0x3d0
[ 36.900371] [<fffffc000104a740>] worker_thread+0x0/0x3d0
[ 36.901348] [<fffffc000105705c>] kthread+0x17c/0x1c0
[ 36.902324] [<fffffc000104a740>] worker_thread+0x0/0x3d0
[ 36.903301] [<fffffc0001011198>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x18/0x20
[ 36.904277] [<fffffc0001056ee0>] kthread+0x0/0x1c0
[ 36.905254] [<fffffc0001011180>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x0/0x20
[ 36.907207] Code:
[ 36.907207] 00000000
[ 36.908184] 00000000
[ 36.909160] 00063301
[ 36.910137] 00000e90
[ 36.911113] 00001111
[ 36.912090] 0000795c
> Have you tried passing rcupdate.rcu_normal=1 as boot parameter
> to the kernel? That allowed me to bypass the network interface
> problem on my system.
Haven't as yet, but backtrace above does not go through rcu routines.
Maybe I am seeing a different issue.
Cheers,
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-16 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-30 22:22 Kernel Oops on alpha with kernel version >=6.9.x Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-01 4:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-01 10:09 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-01 17:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-04 22:22 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-05 15:39 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-05 17:02 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-06 15:39 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-06 17:05 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-07 12:33 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-07 12:39 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-07 17:33 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-07 18:38 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-08 9:43 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-08 21:39 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-08 23:18 ` Michael Cree
2024-12-08 23:31 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-09 8:11 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-12 23:23 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-09 8:05 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-16 22:10 ` Michael Cree [this message]
2024-12-17 6:23 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-18 19:33 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-18 20:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-18 21:54 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-18 22:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-19 22:38 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-19 23:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-20 0:00 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-12-27 10:42 ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-27 11:48 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-12-27 16:30 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-12-31 10:43 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-12 23:25 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-13 0:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-13 3:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-13 5:59 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-13 8:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-13 16:52 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-20 13:01 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-20 13:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-21 13:39 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-23 18:36 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-23 23:00 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-23 23:51 ` Michael Cree
2025-01-23 23:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-24 6:06 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-24 10:55 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-24 16:57 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-25 15:15 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-25 17:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 17:43 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-25 18:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 18:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 19:48 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-25 22:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 23:02 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-26 14:00 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-26 19:15 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-27 11:48 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-27 11:56 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-01-25 18:07 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-01-25 15:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-01-25 17:09 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2025-01-24 6:54 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-24 21:47 Magnus Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2ClSlwznfuk8Uwr@creeky \
--to=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linmag7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.