All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] events/core: fix acoount failure for event's total_enable_time
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:45:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2WRHS4CbbjTIHkQ@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241220153040.GP11133@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

> > It works. but what about this?
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index 065f9188b44a..71ed8f847b04 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -2432,6 +2432,7 @@ __perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event,
> >         if (flags & DETACH_DEAD)
> >                 event->pending_disable = 1;
> >         event_sched_out(event, ctx);
> > +       perf_event_update_time(event);
> >         if (flags & DETACH_GROUP)
> >                 perf_group_detach(event);
> >         if (flags & DETACH_CHILD)
>
> Well, the rule is that timekeeping is tied to state change. And as you
> can see __perf_remove_from_context() violates that.
>
> Probably because someone (probably me) figured that the event would not
> be observed again after detach or something like that.
>

Ah. Thanks to let me know to think this rule.
I agree with your last suggestion.

Could I send patch with it again?

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-20 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-20 10:02 [PATCH v2] events/core: fix acoount failure for event's total_enable_time Yeoreum Yun
2024-12-20 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-20 14:05   ` Yeoreum Yun
2024-12-20 15:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-20 15:26       ` Yeoreum Yun
2024-12-20 15:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-20 15:45           ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2024-12-20 16:23           ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-01-10 16:36             ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-28 18:57               ` Yeo Reum Yun
2025-02-25 20:36                 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-06 13:43                   ` Yeoreum Yun
2024-12-20 15:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-12-20 15:43         ` Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z2WRHS4CbbjTIHkQ@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.