All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: hanhuihui <hanhuihui5@huawei.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, yanan@huawei.com,
	caowangbao@huawei.com, fengtao40@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vrf: Revert:"run conntrack only in context of lower/physdev for locally generated packets"
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 11:10:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2flkWyQNwiClcUg@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241221113308.1003995-1-hanhuihui5@huawei.com>

Hi,

On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 07:33:08PM +0800, hanhuihui wrote:
> In commit 8e0538d8, netfilter skips the NAT hook in the VRF context. This solves the problems mentioned in commit 
> in 8c9c296 and d43b75f. Therefore, we no longer need to set "untracked" to avoid any conntrack 
> participation in round 1.So maybe we can reverts commit 8c9c296a and d43b75fb because we don't need them now.

Did you run netfilter selftests?

> Fixes: 8c9c296 ("vrf: run conntrack only in context of lower/physdev for locally generated packets")
> Fixes: d43b75f ("vrf: don't run conntrack on vrf with !dflt qdisc")

These tags do not look fine.

Thanks.

> Signed-off-by: hanhuihui hanhuihui5@huawei.com
> ---
>  drivers/net/vrf.c | 28 ++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> index b90dccdc2..7b0c35003 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
>  #include <net/fib_rules.h>
>  #include <net/sch_generic.h>
>  #include <net/netns/generic.h>
> -#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h>
>  
>  #define DRV_NAME	"vrf"
>  #define DRV_VERSION	"1.1"
> @@ -416,26 +415,12 @@ static int vrf_local_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>  	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>  }
>  
> -static void vrf_nf_set_untracked(struct sk_buff *skb)
> -{
> -	if (skb_get_nfct(skb) == 0)
> -		nf_ct_set(skb, NULL, IP_CT_UNTRACKED);
> -}
> -
> -static void vrf_nf_reset_ct(struct sk_buff *skb)
> -{
> -	if (skb_get_nfct(skb) == IP_CT_UNTRACKED)
> -		nf_reset_ct(skb);
> -}
> -
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>  static int vrf_ip6_local_out(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
>  			     struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	vrf_nf_reset_ct(skb);
> -
>  	err = nf_hook(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT, net,
>  		      sk, skb, NULL, skb_dst(skb)->dev, dst_output);
>  
> @@ -514,8 +499,6 @@ static int vrf_ip_local_out(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	vrf_nf_reset_ct(skb);
> -
>  	err = nf_hook(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT, net, sk,
>  		      skb, NULL, skb_dst(skb)->dev, dst_output);
>  	if (likely(err == 1))
> @@ -633,7 +616,8 @@ static void vrf_finish_direct(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  		skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN);
>  	}
>  
> -	vrf_nf_reset_ct(skb);
> +	/* reset skb device */
> +	nf_reset_ct(skb);
>  }
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> @@ -647,7 +631,7 @@ static int vrf_finish_output6(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
>  	struct neighbour *neigh;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	vrf_nf_reset_ct(skb);
> +	nf_reset_ct(skb);
>  
>  	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>  	skb->dev = dev;
> @@ -778,8 +762,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip6_out(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
>  	if (rt6_need_strict(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr))
>  		return skb;
>  
> -	vrf_nf_set_untracked(skb);
> -
>  	if (qdisc_tx_is_default(vrf_dev) ||
>  	    IP6CB(skb)->flags & IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED)
>  		return vrf_ip6_out_direct(vrf_dev, sk, skb);
> @@ -866,7 +848,7 @@ static int vrf_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *s
>  	struct neighbour *neigh;
>  	bool is_v6gw = false;
>  
> -	vrf_nf_reset_ct(skb);
> +	nf_reset_ct(skb);
>  
>  	/* Be paranoid, rather than too clever. */
>  	if (unlikely(skb_headroom(skb) < hh_len && dev->header_ops)) {
> @@ -1009,8 +991,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip_out(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
>  	    ipv4_is_lbcast(ip_hdr(skb)->daddr))
>  		return skb;
>  
> -	vrf_nf_set_untracked(skb);
> -
>  	if (qdisc_tx_is_default(vrf_dev) ||
>  	    IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED)
>  		return vrf_ip_out_direct(vrf_dev, sk, skb);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2024-12-22 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-21 11:33 [PATCH] vrf: Revert:"run conntrack only in context of lower/physdev for locally generated packets" hanhuihui
2024-12-22 10:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z2flkWyQNwiClcUg@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=caowangbao@huawei.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=fengtao40@huawei.com \
    --cc=hanhuihui5@huawei.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yanan@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.