From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:14:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3-FePovuu2dEbfG@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109055810.1402918-4-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 06:57:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Otherwise feature reconfiguration can race with I/O submission.
>
> Also drop the bio_clear_polled in the error path, as the flag does not
> matter for instant error completions, it is a left over from when we
> allowed polled I/O to proceed unpolled in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 5:57 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 11:33 ` John Garry
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 8:14 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-01-09 9:03 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 8:16 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-09 9:01 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 06/11] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 13:07 ` John Garry
2025-01-10 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 08/11] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 09/11] usb-storage: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 9:11 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 11/11] loop: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 14:57 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Martin K. Petersen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-10 5:47 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v4 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z3-FePovuu2dEbfG@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.