Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] s390/crash: Use note name macros

[Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>]

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 01:53:51PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2025/01/08 1:17, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 09:45:56PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > Use note name macros to match with the userspace's expectation.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> > >   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c b/arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c
> > 
> > [...]

> > > +#define NT_INIT(buf, type, desc) \
> > > +	(nt_init_name((buf), NT_ ## type, &(desc), sizeof(desc), NN_ ## type))

[...]

> > (Note also, the outer parentheses and the parentheses around (buf)
> > appear redundant -- although harmless?)
> 
> They only make a difference in trivial corner cases and may look needlessly
> verbose.

(In case there was a misunderstanding here, I meant that some
parentheses can be removed without affecting correctness:

#define NT_INIT(buf, type, desc) \
	nt_init_name(buf, NT_ ## type, &(desc), sizeof(desc), NN_ ## type))

It still doesn't matter though -- and some people do prefer to be
defensive anyway and err on the side of having too many parentheses
rather than too few.)

[...]

Cheers
---Dave