From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta0.migadu.com (out-180.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFE4204097 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 20:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736367276; cv=none; b=JfQZeEDGqLxk6fK4lF/PKYF4pi4sCgS9+CwELgJ6q8wf4YCqOpYVUjTcLcBBBYpRfGK+k13ew/Ti5rwbTJV1/DZbvfIj/ZEXagjdcqnfONiwA3RYq9wKI1iq7cB7UqIP8NmK0zsHQikwvKZjmNAfdaVIQzMCg/eGKn2IVRwW4oQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736367276; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6F2pbz/Wu24QOXFP4/iEFKMOEDe0YTjsJCJjNPvrp2g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sPsqhrBv8Xr2tRI4bqJyW5lGEemqLtV+W/tq7hFr1yb6pzayLRmmqrsVMMO09Y3aCL5VyW4HFW6a8HQv5/je+5JZ7rvbprbKkpG/ZztAP6jBl912eejtKHfjfQw2t15WnFFhPKZAJts6Cq3vYSCix9PA1oBkYVIwVv3rMPSYvKk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=h5VZv3N7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="h5VZv3N7" Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:14:07 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1736367260; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3dUcoQ+aJnvEfN1li7ugchm2pXhqwyBsL7eSPz6fVuQ=; b=h5VZv3N739dsIe4sOr6/azdQLG5BRbbL8SnCVksw3MIVjGefRV0Jb3Pfn2Z1MF/5cT26tU Yl+Cc4kSm/JJCVH8649DQj5nvX556dqpLYwPqN28NG7J2IQQiD0T2CVo41j/huapyaxURx sAMxBL8Y42QHcAgAU4Ukfjfi6tQZEQk= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Will Deacon Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Mingwei Zhang , Colton Lewis , Raghavendra Rao Ananta , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] KVM: arm64: Support FEAT_PMUv3 on Apple hardware Message-ID: References: <20241217212048.3709204-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> <20250108123840.GA9197@willie-the-truck> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250108123840.GA9197@willie-the-truck> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hey Will, On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 12:38:41PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > What's your plan for this series? I started looking at it and I can take > the first four apple_m1 patches if you like? I plan on posting a respin of it by next week, which should look pretty much the same besides cleaning up the build error I introduced :) Besides that, I think we need to decide on the KVM side of things whether or not we want to support an event counter in addition to the PMU cycle counter. Janne's FEX use case would certainly benefit from it. Do you think you could grab patch #3? It is entirely unrelated to the series at this point with the PMUv3 event remapping helper. -- Thanks, Oliver