From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test cpumap: Avoid use-after-free following merge
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:41:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z37jBKAdWNmWMPi6@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac163e57-1bf8-4662-920c-9dbfecb26c06@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 03:07:53PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 08/01/2025 5:15 am, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Previously cpu maps in the test weren't modified by calls to the cpu
> > map API, however, perf_cpu_map__merge was modified so the left hand
> > argument was updated. In the test this meant the maps copy of the
> > "two" map was put/deleted in the merge meaning when accessed via maps,
> > the pointer was stale and to the put/deleted memory. To fix this add
> > an extra layer of indirection to the maps array, so the updated value
> > of two is accessed.
> >
> > Fixes: a9d2217556f7 ("libperf cpumap: Refactor perf_cpu_map__merge()")
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 5:15 [PATCH v1] perf test cpumap: Avoid use-after-free following merge Ian Rogers
2025-01-08 15:07 ` James Clark
2025-01-08 20:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z37jBKAdWNmWMPi6@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.