All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	randyj@purestorage.com, jrani@purestorage.com
Subject: nvme-fc: Question about __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios()
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:32:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z38nGkThjH59LFrf@ceto> (raw)

Hello,

I was looking at this code and I had a question about it.

drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
2473 static void
2474 __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, bool start_queues)
2475 {
...
...
2503                 blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&ctrl->tag_set,
2504                                 nvme_fc_terminate_exchange, &ctrl->ctrl);
2505                 blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request(&ctrl->tag_set);

nvme_fc_terminate_exchange() calls __nvme_fc_abort_op() to abort all active
ops with status FCPOP_STATE_ACTIVE. I think these active ops map to in-flight
requests MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT. After blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() returns it is not
guaranteed that all ops had done callback functions called on them. Some
of these requests might still be in-flight.

blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request() makes sure that we do not have pending
completed requests, but it does not check for in-flight requests?

Am I missing something obvious here?

Why we need blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request() here?
Is it possible to have in-flight requests after the function returns?

Should this call be moved to nvme_fc_delete_association() after all the
requests are aborted by LLDD?

Thanks,
Mohamed Khalfella


             reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-09  1:32 Mohamed Khalfella [this message]
2025-01-09  1:59 ` nvme-fc: Question about __nvme_fc_abort_outstanding_ios() Ming Lei
2025-01-09 17:52   ` Mohamed Khalfella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z38nGkThjH59LFrf@ceto \
    --to=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jrani@purestorage.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.