All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Reject a negative nr_irqs value in dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify()
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 19:13:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3Q0TY873woxmsEC@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241231155158.5edodo2r5zar3tfe@thinkpad>

On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 09:21:58PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 08:23:29AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > Platforms that do not have (one or more) dedicated IRQs for the eDMA
> > need to set nr_irqs to a non-zero value in their DWC glue driver.
> > 
> > Platforms that do have (one or more) dedicated IRQs do not need to
> > initialize nr_irqs. DWC common code will automatically set nr_irqs.
> > 
> > Since a glue driver can initialize nr_irqs, dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify()
> > should verify that nr_irqs, if non-zero, is a valid value. Thus, add a
> > check in dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() to reject a negative nr_irqs value.
> > 
> 
> Why can't we make dw_edma_chip::nr_irqs unsigned?

dw_edma is defined in drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
in struct dw_edma.

struct dw_pcie (defined in drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h)
simply has a struct dw_edma as a struct member.

If you bounce on nr_irqs in:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
and in
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
you can see that this driver uses signed int for this everywhere.

I didn't feel like refactoring a whole DMA driver.


dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() is supposed to verify that nr_irqs is either
initialized to a valid value by a DWC PCIe glue driver, or that common
code initializes it.

If nr_irqs is initialized by a glue driver && "pci->edma.nr_irqs != ch_cnt",
dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() returns error and avoids calling dw_edma_probe(),
thus it made sense for dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() to also return error on
negative nr_irqs.


Kind regards,
Niklas

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-31 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-20  7:23 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Reject a negative nr_irqs value in dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() Niklas Cassel
2024-12-31 15:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-31 18:13   ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-12-31 18:49     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-01-02 10:57       ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z3Q0TY873woxmsEC@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.