All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: sumit.garg@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	elder@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] fix reference leak in locomo_init_one_child()
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 12:28:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3p6-LeZZ2ZGupEc@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250105111156.277058-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn>

On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 07:11:56PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> Once device_register() failed, we should call put_device() to
> decrement reference count for cleanup. Or it could cause memory leak.
> 
> device_register() includes device_add(). As comment of device_add()
> says, 'if device_add() succeeds, you should call device_del() when you
> want to get rid of it. If device_add() has not succeeded, use only
> put_device() to drop the reference count'.

The commit message is not quite correct:

"After calling device_register(), the correct way to dispose of the
device is to call put_device() as per the device_register()
documentation rather than kfree()."

This reveals that your patch is not completely correct.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/locomo.c b/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
> index cb6ef449b987..7274010218ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ locomo_init_one_child(struct locomo *lchip, struct locomo_dev_info *info)
>  
>  	ret = device_register(&dev->dev);
>  	if (ret) {
> +		put_device(&dev->dev);
>   out:
>  		kfree(dev);

... and that leads to the second problem here - this kfree() will lead
to a double-free of the device. Once by the reference count dropping to
zero, resulting in locomo_dev_release() being called, and then this
kfree().

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!


      reply	other threads:[~2025-01-05 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-05 11:11 [PATCH] [ARM] fix reference leak in locomo_init_one_child() Ma Ke
2025-01-05 12:28 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z3p6-LeZZ2ZGupEc@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=make24@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.