From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+3c2e3cc60665d71de2f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
anna-maria@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] signal/posixtimers: Handle ignore/blocked sequences correctly
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 01:49:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4cGMLwLAVDZVFbQ@pavilion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ikqhcnjn.ffs@tglx>
Le Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 06:28:44PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> syzbot triggered the warning in posixtimer_send_sigqueue(), which warns
> about a non-ignored signal being already queued on the ignored list.
>
> The warning is actually bogus, as the following sequence causes this:
>
> signal($SIG, SIGIGN);
> timer_settime(...); // arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is ignored and queued on ignored list
>
> sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ...); // block the signal
> timer_settime(...); // re-arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is not ignored because it is blocked
> ---> Warning triggers as signal is on the ignored list
>
> Ideally timer_settime() could remove the signal, but that's racy and
> incomplete vs. other scenarios and requires a full reevaluation of the
> pending signal list.
>
> Instead of adding more complexity, handle it gracefully by removing the
> warning and requeueing the signal to the pending list. That's correct
> versus:
>
> 1) sig[timed]wait() as that does not check for SIGIGN and only relies on
> dequeue_signal() -> posixtimers_deliver_signal() to check whether the
> pending signal is still valid.
>
> 2) Unblocking of the signal.
>
> - If the unblocking happens before SIGIGN is replaced by a signal
> handler, then the timer is rearmed in dequeue_signal(), but
> get_signal() will ignore it. The next timer expiry will move it back
> to the ignored list.
>
> - If SIGIGN was replaced before unblocking, then the signal will be
> delivered and a subsequent expiry will queue a signal on the pending
> list again.
>
> There is a related scenario to trigger the complementary warning in the
> signal ignored path, which does not expect the signal to be on the pending
> list when it is ignored. That can be triggered even before the above change
> via:
>
> task1 task2
>
> signal($SIG, SIGIGN);
> sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, ...);
>
> timer_create(); // Signal target is task2
> timer_settime(...); // arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is not ignored because it is blocked
> and queued on the pending list of task2
>
> syscall()
> // Sets the pending flag
> sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, ...);
>
> -> preemption, task2 cannot dequeue the signal
>
> timer_settime(...); // re-arm periodic timer
>
> timer fires, signal is ignored
> ---> Warning triggers as signal is on task2's pending list
> and the thread group is not exiting
>
> Consequently, remove that warning too and just keep the signal on the
> pending list.
>
> The following attempt to deliver the signal on return to user space of
> task2 will ignore the signal and a subsequent expiry will bring it back to
> the ignored list, if it did not get blocked or un-ignored before that.
>
> Fixes: df7a996b4dab ("signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list")
> Reported-by: syzbot+3c2e3cc60665d71de2f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 17:14 [syzbot] [kernel?] WARNING in posixtimer_send_sigqueue (2) syzbot
2024-12-19 19:46 ` [PATCH] signal/posixtimers: Handle ignore/blocked sequences correctly Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-20 13:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-20 13:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-20 13:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-20 14:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-01-14 17:28 ` [PATCH V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2025-01-15 0:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2025-01-15 17:19 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4cGMLwLAVDZVFbQ@pavilion.home \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzbot+3c2e3cc60665d71de2f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.