From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Kun Hu <huk23@m.fudan.edu.cn>,
Jiaji Qin <jjtan24@m.fudan.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: don't call vfs_flush() with queue frozen
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 01:40:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4eChfyt15sCL8rV@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4dwFFIb6gjAa4wd@fedora>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:21:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:05:00PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:37:08AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Actually some FSs may call kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL) with i_rwsem grabbed,
> > > which could call into real deadlock if IO on the loop disk is caused by
> > > the kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL).
> >
> > Well, loop can always deadlock when the lower fs is doing allocations,
> > even without the freeze. I'm actually kinda surprised loop doesn't
> > force a context noio as we'd really need that.
>
> Loop does call mapping_set_gfp_mask(~(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS)).
But that only helps with page cache allocations, not other allocations
don't in the I/O path, of which there are plenty in modern file systems.
> > And all of these are caused by not breaking the dependency loop..
>
> Can you share how to break the dependency? Such as fs_reclaim &
> mm->mmap_lock.
fs_reclaim should not be broken. It's a fake lockdep key annotation
the reclaim path. Everything under it needs to be NOFS, or in case
of loop NOIO (see above). I think mmap_lock is just an indirect chain
here, but I need to take a closer look. A little busty this week and
only sporadically online, sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 2:24 [PATCH] loop: don't call vfs_flush() with queue frozen Ming Lei
2025-01-13 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 8:22 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 9:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 15:07 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-15 2:37 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-15 7:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-15 8:21 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-15 9:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-14 3:21 ` Kun Hu
2025-02-18 5:39 ` Kun Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4eChfyt15sCL8rV@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=huk23@m.fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=jjtan24@m.fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.