Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PM: Revert "Add EXPORT macros for exporting PM functions"

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:27:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 5:13 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:09:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 4:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The introduced macros are not doing what they intend for, namely
> > > > they won't eliminate the code when CONFIG_PM=n.
> > >
> > > I don't think they have ever been expected to eliminate the code then.
> > > They just don't export the symbols in that case.
> >
> > Then I'm really puzzled with (potential) usefulness of them to begin with.
> > Having a dead code that is not exported is doubtful benefit.
> 
> Arguably, exported dead code is even worse.
> 
> Anyway, it is hard to say what they are good for if there are no users.
> 
> My point really is that you don't need to add anything beyond "this
> stuff has no users" to get it removed and arguing about what the
> unused stuff was intended for is not very useful so to speak.

I see. Shall I send a v3 with the reduced commit message?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko