From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Seyi Kuforiji <kuforiji98@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] t/unit-tests: convert mem-pool test to use clar test framework
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:12:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4kF1zR9TA8ff2bl@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250116104911.77405-3-kuforiji98@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:49:09AM +0100, Seyi Kuforiji wrote:
> Adapt the mem-pool test script to use clar framework by using clar
> assertions where necessary. Following the consensus to convert the
> unit-tests scripts found in the t/unit-tests folder to clar driven by
> Patrick Steinhardt.
I think it's a minor detail that isn't really worth mentioning that I
was the one introducing the clar, so I'd leave my name out of it. This
also applies to subsequent commit messages.
> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c b/t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index fe500c704b..0000000000
> --- a/t/unit-tests/t-mem-pool.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
> -#include "test-lib.h"
> -#include "mem-pool.h"
> -
> -static void setup_static(void (*f)(struct mem_pool *), size_t block_alloc)
> -{
> - struct mem_pool pool = { .block_alloc = block_alloc };
> - f(&pool);
> - mem_pool_discard(&pool, 0);
> -}
> -
> -static void t_calloc_100(struct mem_pool *pool)
> -{
> - size_t size = 100;
> - char *buffer = mem_pool_calloc(pool, 1, size);
> - for (size_t i = 0; i < size; i++)
> - check_int(buffer[i], ==, 0);
> - if (!check(pool->mp_block != NULL))
> - return;
> - check(pool->mp_block->next_free != NULL);
> - check(pool->mp_block->end != NULL);
> -}
> -
> -int cmd_main(int argc UNUSED, const char **argv UNUSED)
> -{
> - TEST(setup_static(t_calloc_100, 1024 * 1024),
> - "mem_pool_calloc returns 100 zeroed bytes with big block");
> - TEST(setup_static(t_calloc_100, 1),
> - "mem_pool_calloc returns 100 zeroed bytes with tiny block");
> -
> - return test_done();
> -}
Mh, too bad that Git doesn't render it as a
> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/u-mem-pool.c b/t/unit-tests/u-mem-pool.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..36e31a3201
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/unit-tests/u-mem-pool.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +#include "unit-test.h"
> +#include "mem-pool.h"
> +
> +static void t_calloc_100(size_t block_alloc)
Can we maybe give this a more descriptive name? Something like
`test_many_pool_allocations()` maybe?
> +{
> + struct mem_pool pool = { .block_alloc = block_alloc };
> + size_t size = 100;
> + char *buffer = mem_pool_calloc(&pool, 1, size);
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < size; i++)
> + cl_assert_equal_i(0, buffer[i]);
> + cl_assert(pool.mp_block != NULL);
> + cl_assert(pool.mp_block->next_free != NULL);
> + cl_assert(pool.mp_block->end != NULL);
> + mem_pool_discard(&pool, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void test_mem_pool__big_block(void)
> +{
> + t_calloc_100(1024 * 1024);
> +
There is a needless empty line here.
Other than that the changes look good to me.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 10:49 [PATCH 0/4] t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] t/unit-tests: handle dashes in test suite filenames Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 13:12 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-16 10:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] t/unit-tests: convert mem-pool test to use clar test framework Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 13:12 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-01-16 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-16 10:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] t/unit-tests: adapt priority queue " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 13:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-16 10:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] t/unit-tests: convert reftable tree " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] t/unit-tests: handle dashes in test suite filenames Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-17 6:27 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-16 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] t/unit-tests: convert mem-pool test to use clar test framework Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] t/unit-tests: adapt priority queue " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-16 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] t/unit-tests: convert reftable tree " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-17 6:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-17 12:29 ` Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-17 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] t/unit-tests: handle dashes in test suite filenames Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-17 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] t/unit-tests: convert mem-pool test to use clar test framework Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-20 10:18 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-01-17 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] t/unit-tests: adapt priority queue " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-20 10:22 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-01-17 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] t/unit-tests: convert reftable tree " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-01-17 13:36 ` t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4kF1zR9TA8ff2bl@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuforiji98@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.