From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A46C02183 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6D23C7B35 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:31:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4943C296F for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:30:55 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1929E60D4E8 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:30:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768F6210F5; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:30:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737109853; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QyKCVJtf6tyT2oXnTbG3JTAFK96QdE0l2xOQcrDYv0=; b=GP5dYyItldy5WAJYlLWsMCyCOqE/2wlyWdYDB3OKefyyTSWG1E2U/cuJ4yiqd6Skqmgr7c i5Yd17Jtilsa7H4yDk0/wr/RnbuhKkJQJZkBcF0uyJqieENT23q8MVT+YQT5zC6X19VJiV +t0pv5ynYDfr9mbnpnFQY+e1ZBJoKEM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737109853; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QyKCVJtf6tyT2oXnTbG3JTAFK96QdE0l2xOQcrDYv0=; b=5ozWewXGUC91D5MmFP4FWeymhcEDBJWLFvzhurSbVvNT0Ua5Ar3QVOnPEv9fIcUBamM5P5 N4fdwWs1roqtdvCw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=GP5dYyIt; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=5ozWewXG DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1737109853; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QyKCVJtf6tyT2oXnTbG3JTAFK96QdE0l2xOQcrDYv0=; b=GP5dYyItldy5WAJYlLWsMCyCOqE/2wlyWdYDB3OKefyyTSWG1E2U/cuJ4yiqd6Skqmgr7c i5Yd17Jtilsa7H4yDk0/wr/RnbuhKkJQJZkBcF0uyJqieENT23q8MVT+YQT5zC6X19VJiV +t0pv5ynYDfr9mbnpnFQY+e1ZBJoKEM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1737109853; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QyKCVJtf6tyT2oXnTbG3JTAFK96QdE0l2xOQcrDYv0=; b=5ozWewXGUC91D5MmFP4FWeymhcEDBJWLFvzhurSbVvNT0Ua5Ar3QVOnPEv9fIcUBamM5P5 N4fdwWs1roqtdvCw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E16913A30; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id aBv1FV0ximdzXwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:30:53 +0000 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:30:44 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20250117084118.740225-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20250117095742.GA749338@pevik> <20250117101804.GA750287@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250117101804.GA750287@pevik> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 768F6210F5 X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[lists.linux.it,gmail.com,suse.com,redhat.com,suse.de,suse.cz]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, suse.cz:email, suse.cz:dkim] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] lib: Multiply slow config only for a real tests X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > via: > tst_max_delay_ = tst_multiply_timeout(MAX_DELAY * 1000000); > > I wonder if this should be wrapped with > #ifndef TST_NO_DEFAULT_MAIN I do not think so, it makes perfect sense that the timeout for retry is multiplied on a debug kernel. The real question is if we need to retry the clone in the case of tst_ns_exec. The commit that added the retry loop was: commit 7d882081a5613f44a12fc6b1c44267d4df0857a4 Author: Petr Vorel Date: Mon Mar 28 22:46:43 2022 +0200 lib: Retry safe_clone() on ENOSPC In some tests we are creating the namespaces faster than they are being asynchronously cleaned up in the kernel: I guess that this is not going to be the case for tst_ns_exec because we are not adding new namespaces but rather cloning a processes into an existing namespace. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp