All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.km@gmail.com>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	honggyu.kim@sk.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	horen.chuang@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	kernel_team@skhynix.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 11:53:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z55RpQgsma5wrpfh@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z55QmybX5IkuLv6Q@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>

On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 11:49:31AM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> >   1. the auto mode set the weights as 10:5:1 for node{0-2}.
> >   2. node2 is offlined, then recalculation makes it as 2:1 for node{0,1}.

Point of clarification here:  a hot-unplug event won't cause
recalculation.

What actually causes re-weight is hot-plug reporting new capacity.

So in this scenario, the weight will remain the same for node2.

> >   3. the auto sysfs interface is set to 0 to make it manual mode.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-01 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28 22:23 [PATCH v4] Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning Joshua Hahn
2025-01-31 14:23 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-01 16:49   ` Gregory Price
2025-02-01 16:53     ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-02-02 13:51       ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-02 14:12         ` Joshua Hahn
2025-02-03 12:44           ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-03 15:38             ` Gregory Price
2025-02-05  2:26               ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-02 13:44     ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-04  7:50 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-04 16:30   ` Gregory Price
2025-02-12 17:27     ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z55RpQgsma5wrpfh@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=honggyu.km@gmail.com \
    --cc=horen.chuang@linux.dev \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.